Air speed in car radiator -- Heat Exchange calculations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the air speed in a car radiator for heat exchange calculations using the equation Q = U*A*LMTD. The user is attempting to determine the external convection coefficient, which requires the Reynolds number influenced by air speed. The conversation highlights the challenge of accurately calculating air velocity considering both tubes and fins, and suggests that empirical methods may be necessary to derive the heat transfer coefficient (U) experimentally. Participants emphasize the availability of heat transfer correlations for air flow across finned tubes as a potential resource.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat exchange principles, specifically Q = U*A*LMTD.
  • Knowledge of forced convection and its implications in thermal systems.
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number and its calculation.
  • Experience with heat transfer coefficients in fluid dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research heat transfer correlations for air flow across finned tubes.
  • Explore empirical methods for calculating the heat transfer coefficient (U) experimentally.
  • Learn about ducting arrangements and their impact on air velocity in radiators.
  • Investigate the role of cooling fan specifications in forced convection scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, thermal system designers, and students working on automotive heat exchange systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing radiator performance and understanding forced convection dynamics.

r4m0n0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is my first post. This question is related to my final thesis.

I'm calculating the heat exchange area of a radiator through heat exchange equations:

Q = U*A*LMTD

I have as data Q, and LMTD (this one through trivial calculations)

In order to calculate U, I need the coefficients for external and internal (both tubes and fins) convection.
Internal convection coefficient is quite easy to calculate.
My doubts come when trying to calculate the external convection coefficient. As you may know to calculate the coefficient you need the Reynolds number (amongst other things).
Reynolds depends on the fluid speed (in this case air speed) and in order to calculate it I thought of the following equation:

v=(V_dot_air)/(no.of tubes*area of tubes) --->

The thing is... this calculation doesn't take in account the fins of the radiator, thus not having an accurate value for velocity.
But if I took in account the area of the fins into the equation, the velocity of air would be very VERY slow.

Can anyone suggest a better way to calculate air speed through a car radiator?

Thanks in advance :)
cross_flow_square_fins.png

(Image enclosed: a simplification of a car radiator)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's forced convection not natural convection .

Mass flow and velocity of cooling air is primarily determined by the cooling fan and possibly by forward velocity of vehicle depending on ducting arrangement .
 
If you have data on Q and LMTD, then you have enough to calculate U experimentally. So why are you trying to calculate it from the flows?

Chet
 
@Nidum:

Yes, it is forced convection, I never said otherwise. I'm calculating the air velocity "from scratch" so in order to know how the ducting arrangement and the cooling fan type/size I must calculate before the air velocity.

@Chestermiller:

Calculate U experimentally? Can you give me more insight on that? I have no physical model, everything is theorical.
 
r4m0n0 said:
Calculate U experimentally? Can you give me more insight on that? I have no physical model, everything is theorical.
Oh. You didn't say that. OK, how do you know the coolant flow rate to get the heat transfer coefficient on the tube side?

There are definitely heat transfer correlations available for air flow across banks of finned tubes. But you need to do the research yourself to find them.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K