Air Traffic Controller and Related Rates along with Implicit Differentiation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rate at which the distance between two planes is decreasing using related rates and implicit differentiation. The planes are initially 120 miles and 160 miles from a convergence point, moving at speeds of 400 mph and 450 mph, respectively. The solution involves differentiating the equation \(z^2 = x^2 + y^2\) to find \(\frac{dz}{dt}\) and setting it to zero to minimize the distance \(z\). The correct rates of change are \(\frac{dx}{dt} = -400\) mph and \(\frac{dy}{dt} = -450\) mph, leading to the equation \(\frac{dz}{dt} = 2(120-400t)(-400) + 2(160-450t)(-450) = 0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of related rates in calculus
  • Knowledge of implicit differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem in the context of distance
  • Ability to solve equations involving derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in implicit differentiation
  • Learn how to set up and solve related rates problems in calculus
  • Explore optimization techniques for minimizing distances in calculus
  • Review the concepts of motion and speed in relation to calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on related rates and optimization problems, as well as educators looking for examples of implicit differentiation applications in real-world scenarios.

Salazar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"An air traffic controller spots two planes at the same altitude converging on a point as they fly at right angles to each other. One plane is 120 miles from the point and is moving at 400 miles per hour. The other plane is 160 miles from the point and has a speed of 450 miles per hour."
"a. At what rate is the distance between the planes decreasing?
b. If the controller does not intervene, how close will the planes come to each other?"

Homework Equations



None given.

The Attempt at a Solution



I first used x^2+y^2=z^2. I differentiated that and got 2x(dx/dt) +2y(dy/dt) = 2z(dz/dt).
The unknown being solved for was (dz/dt) for part and I had the rates for (dx/dt) and (dy/dt). I also had x and y, which were the distances.
I plugged it in and solved for (dz/dt). 2(160)(450) + 2(120)(400) = 2(200)(dz/dt) [z was found by using x^2+y^2=z^2].

For part b) I am a little lost on what to do. I am trying to find an extrema, the minimum for z, the distance between the planes. I am not sure how to set it up to find the minimum or what to do exactly. Can anyone please help? :\
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's pretty straight forward: yes, you want to minimize z where z^2= x^2+ y^2 and you do that by setting dz/dt= 0 and solving for t.

Of course, dz/dt= 2x(dx/dt)+ 2y(dy/dt) and you know that dx/dt= -400 and dy/dt= -420 (notice the signs- the two airplanes are moving toward the intersection of their routes so the distance between each and that intersection is decreasing. Of course, with x and y being the distance from each plane to that intersection, taking t= 0 when x is 120 and y is 160, x= 120- 400t and y= 160- 420t.

Your equation is dz/dt= 2(120-400t)(-400)+ 2(160-420t)(-420)= 0. Solve that for t, determine the position of each airplane at that t and find the distance between them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It's pretty straight forward: yes, you want to minimize z where z^2= x^2+ y^2 and you do that by setting dz/dt= 0 and solving for t.

Of course, dz/dt= 2x(dx/dt)+ 2y(dy/dt) and you know that dx/dt= -400 and dy/dt= -420 (notice the signs- the two airplanes are moving toward the intersection of their routes so the distance between each and that intersection is decreasing. Of course, with x and y being the distance from each plane to that intersection, taking t= 0 when x is 120 and y is 160, x= 120- 400t and y= 160- 420t.

Your equation is dz/dt= 2(120-400t)(-400)+ 2(160-420t)(-420)= 0. Solve that for t, determine the position of each airplane at that t and find the distance between them.

Thanks, this really helped out. But just to be sure, it would be dz/dt= 2(120-400t)(-400)+ 2(160-450t)(-450)= 0, not using -420.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K