MHB Algebra/Physics problem - kinematics

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathkid3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
To determine the runway length required for a light plane to reach a takeoff speed of 33 m/s with a constant acceleration of 3.8 m/s², the kinematic equations are applied. The initial velocity is assumed to be 0, and the time to reach the final velocity is calculated using the equation V = V0 + at, resulting in approximately 8.68 seconds. Using the equation for distance, x = x0 + V0t + 1/2at², the total runway length is computed to be 143.30 meters. This calculation confirms that a minimum runway length of 143.30 meters is necessary for the plane to achieve its required speed for takeoff. Understanding these kinematic equations is essential for solving similar physics problems.
mathkid3
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A light plane must reach a speed of 33 m/s for takeoff. How long must the runway be if the plane has a constant acceleration of 3.8 m/s2 ?so, I am new to kinomatic equations. We are using the 4 Basic ones.

need to see this one worked out if I may.Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Algebra/Physics problem

What is the target variable? That is, what is it for which you're trying to solve?
 
Re: Algebra/Physics problem

distance?
 
Re: Algebra/Physics problem

What is it that you are given? And how may we relate these values?
 
Re: Algebra/Physics problem

Another way of saying what MarkFL said is this: can you write down a relevant, correct equation involving the target variable of distance?
 
Re: Algebra/Physics problem

mathkid3 said:
A light plane must reach a speed of 33 m/s for takeoff. How long must the runway be if the plane has a constant acceleration of 3.8 m/s2 ?so, I am new to kinomatic equations. We are using the 4 Basic ones.

need to see this one worked out if I may.Thanks

I think the OP meant the kinematic equations, 4 basic ones meaning:

1) x=x0+V0t+1/2at2
2) V=V0+at
3) a=constant
4) V2=V02+2a(x-x0)

If this is the case, the answer is a matter of determining starting values.

We can assume that the plane starts off at point 0 on the runway meaning that x0=0. we can also assume that the plane's initial velocity is 0, V0=0 (before moving). now we are given the acceleration, a=3.8m/s2, and final velocity, V=33m/s. From this we can find how long it will take the plane to reach the final velocity, using equation 2:

33m/s=0+(3.8m/s2)t
t=(33/3.8)s

Now that we have a value for t, we can use equation 1 to find the total runway length, x, required to reach takeoff speed:

x=0+0(t)+1/2at2
=(1/2)(3.8m/s2)((33/3.8)s)2
=143.30m

therefore the minimum amount of runway needed to reach the plane's necessary takeoff speed is 143.30 meters.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top