MHB Master Algebraic Fractions: Step-by-Step Guide with 3+ Sum Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordy2707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
To solve the expression -6/(s+3) - 4/(s+2) + 3/(s+1) + 2, the first step is to determine the lowest common denominator (LCD), which is the product of the distinct denominators. Each term must be adjusted to have this common denominator by multiplying by the appropriate factors. After adjusting, the expression can be combined into a single rational expression with a common denominator of (s+3)(s+2)(s+1). The final step involves expanding the numerator and combining like terms to simplify the expression. This method mirrors the process of adding fractions, making it manageable for those familiar with algebraic operations.
fordy2707
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi all thanks for any help ,Can You solve:

View attachment 5445

I have the answer in my book but I don't know how the answer is reached

please show steps to solve, i can solve 2 sum fractions but not sure where to start with 3 or more sums involved
 

Attachments

  • FullSizeRender.jpg
    FullSizeRender.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 106
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given the expression:

$$-\frac{6}{s+3}-\frac{4}{s+2}+\frac{3}{s+1}+2$$

And instructed to rewrite this expression as a single rational expression. Before we can do this, we need to determine the lowest common denominator (LCD), and since all denominators are prime with respect to each other, this will simply be the product of them all.

To make each term have this LCD, we need to take the LCD, and divide by denominator each term already has, and then multiply each term by 1 in the form of this quotient divided by itself. For example, the first term already has a denominator of $s+3$, and so we find the quotient:

$$\frac{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{s+3}=(s+2)(s+1)$$

And so we will want to multiply the first term by:

$$1=\frac{(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+2)(s+1)}$$

I am emphasizing that this expression is equal to 1 so that it is clear that in doing so we are not changing the value of that term. Doing the same for the other terms, we will have:

$$-\frac{6}{s+3}\cdot\frac{(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+2)(s+1)}-\frac{4}{s+2}\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+1)}+\frac{3}{s+1}\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+2)}{(s+3)(s+2)}+2\cdot\frac{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}$$

Now, all 4 terms have the same denominator, and we can combine them:

$$\frac{-6(s+2)(s+1)-4(s+3)(s+1)+3(s+3)(s+2)+2(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}{(s+3)(s+2)(s+1)}$$

And so now we have done as instructed. You may wish to expand and then combine like terms in the numerator. :)
 
Nice one with your help I've worked it out, it's a long calculation to get the simplest form with no brackets but a good challenge
 
All we're doing here is repeating a/b + c/d = (ad + bc)/bd. If you're used to doing this, this should be easy.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top