Alkyl Halide Mechanism: E1 vs. E2 in Acidic and Basic Conditions

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on alkyl halide mechanisms, it is established that E1 predominates in strongly acidic conditions due to carbocation stability, while E2 is favored in strongly basic conditions, particularly with large bases. The reaction rates vary, with E1 proceeding moderately and E2 being relatively quick, influenced by sterics and alkene stability. For the provided substrates, 2-chloro-3-s-butylhexane yields 3-s-butyl-2-hexene as the major product under acidic conditions, while E2 is expected to occur under basic conditions. The overall reactivity trends indicate that E2 is more favorable with stronger bases, while E1 is more common with secondary or tertiary substrates in weaker base environments. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for predicting the outcomes of elimination reactions.
predentalgirl1
Messages
61
Reaction score
1
This is my question...
For the alkyl halide tell which mechanism, E1 or E2, will predominate under both stongly basic (with large base) conditions and strongly acidic. Tell if each reaction is expected to proceed relatively quickly, moderately, or slow (based on sterics for E2 and carbocation stability for E1). Finally, name the primary alkene produced in each case.




a.) 2-chloro-3-s-butylhexane

b.) 1-chloro-3-s-butylhexane

c.) 3-chloro-3-s-butylhexane



My answer...only part of part (a)...

acidic prefers E1, moderate rate, major product 3-s-butly-2-hexene. basic prefers E2.

How do I solve for the rest?? Someone please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, I put this in the wrong forum and I do not know how to move it. This is a homework question.
 
I found this discussion on the Web:

Comparison or E1 and E2:
E2 vs E1:
E2 is characterized by:
· second order kinetics
· anti periplanar conformation for elimination
· absence of rearrangement
· reactivity sequence: CH3 < 1° < 2° < 3°

E1 is characterized by:
· first order kinetics
· rearrangement
· reactivity sequence: CH3 < 1° < 2° < 3°


For a given substrate, which mechanism will be followed? Whichever of these two processes goes faster determines which mechanism predominates.

To answer this question:

1. Consider the substrate (alkyl halide). It can either undergo deprotonation by a base leading to 1,2-elimination, or heterolysis to form a carbocation followed by deprotonation.
Reactivity by E2 increases mostly due to increasing stability of the alkene formed with a
more highly substituted alkyl group. Reactivity by E1 increases because of greater stability of the carbocation being formed in the rate determining step. Thus reactivity by both mechanisms increases as CH3 < 1° < 2° < 3°.

2. Consider the base. The rate of E2 depends on both the concentration and strength of the base, whereas E1 does not. In E1, the base must wait for the carbocation to be formed, so neither the concentration nor strength of the base will matter much. For a given substrate, the more concentrated or stronger the base, the more E2 will be favored over E1. Under the conditions usually used to bring about dehrydrohalogenation, strong and concentrated base, E2 usually occurs. In general the E1 mechanism is encountered only with secondary or tertiary substrates, and in solutions where the base is either in low concentration or weak, typically where the base is solvent.
http://depts.washington.edu/chemcrs/bulkdisk/chem237A_aut01/info_Ch_6&7.pdf

For acid-catalyzed eliimnation, the first step is the protonation of the halogen followed by elimination of the hydrogen halide. A carbocation is the result. (kinda like E1 in that respect)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top