Allegedly "debunking" the Cavendish Experiment

[DarthOblivious]

TL;DR

Someone showed me this and I wanted to know everything that's wrong about it.

A flatearther sent this to me a few months ago. Dude actually thought this... "project" would convince me. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories at all, but my knowledge of science is very, very modest, so I can't personally scrutinize it properly. Would anyone be kind enough to help?

EDIT: Forgot the link, lol:
(link removed by mentor: non-accredited journal)

 

[PeroK]

It's a waste of time analysing such things as they are generally nonsense.

 

[Baluncore]

Welcome to PF.

The Cavendish experiment has NOT been debunked, and can be repeated today.

That is a list of possible distractions that, then and now, play no part in the experiment. The list was constructed by a non-scientist, acting as devil's advocate, with the aim of muddying the water of science, with pseudo-science.

 

[Ibix]

Any work that seriously compares two values with different dimensions (Newton's $G$ and whatever nonsense Spear's $Ge$ is supposed to be) and declares them "very close" can safely be dismissed as the work of a clueless poser. Is 1m "very close to" 1kg? Is 1km "very close to" 1kg? What does it even mean to compare a distance to a weight? If it didn't occur to anybody involved in the publication of that paper to ask the equivalent question about $G$ and $Ge$, nobody involved has even the most basic grasp of physics.

 

[jedishrfu]

Don't waste your time arguing with a flatearth person. They will simply not trust your evidence and conclude its all a conspiracy theory to hide the flatness of the Earth.

Closing thread, thanks to everyone who contributed here.