Alternate angle for sin (2*theta) ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter coconutgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding two alternate angles related to the equation sin(2*theta) in a projectile motion problem involving a rifle aimed at a target. The user successfully calculates the smaller angle using the formula sin(2*theta) = (g*x)/(v0)^2, resulting in an angle of approximately 0.07734 degrees. The larger alternate angle is determined to be 89.92266 degrees, derived from the relationship with the smaller angle. The importance of providing a clear problem statement is emphasized for effective assistance. Overall, the thread highlights the use of trigonometric identities in solving projectile motion problems.
coconutgt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I believe this could be the easiest math post of the day, but it's been too long for me to recall. Anyways, I'm working on the problem where I have to find 2 alternate angles. I got the first (smaller) angle right which is sin(2*theta). Now I have to find the second (bigger) angle which is suppose to involve pi with the sin(2*theta) in some way. Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you post a sketch or something? Does the term "alternate" angle mean something significant in the problem? I'm not sure you've given enough info for us to be able to help you.
 
sin(2*theta) isn't an angle.

Although you may be looking for pi-2*theta, a better description of the problem would be good
 
The drawing shows an exaggerated view of a rifle that has been ‘sighted in' for a 91.4-meter target. If the muzzle speed of the bullet is v0 = 576 m/s, there are the two possible angles 1 and 2 between the rifle barrel and the horizontal such that the bullet will hit the target. One of these angles is so large that it is never used in target shooting. Give your answers as (a) the smaller angle and (b) the larger angle. (Hint: The following trigonometric identity may be useful: 2 sin cos = sin 2.)


Pic: http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l182/coconutgt/rifle.gif

I worked out and got the (a) part which is:


sin(2*theta) = (g*x)/(v0)^2

---substitute everything

sin(2*theta) = (9.8*91.4)/(576)^2

---then

theta = 1/2 * sin^-1[(9.8*91.4)/(576)^2]

theta = 0.07734 degree
 
I got it. What I did was graph the sin(2*theta). I then got 2 points from the graph which are:

45 degree - x = 0.07734 degree
45 degree + x = 89.92266 degree <--- (b) answer

So, the alternate angle is just 90 degree (pi/2) - the first smaller angle which came from the original sin(2*theta)

:D
 
Good job coconutgt. Welcome to PF, BTW. As you can probably tell, a clear problem statement helps us to help you in one or two replys at most. Mixed or partial problem statements make it a lot harder to help you with hints or error corrections quickly. PF is a great, diverse place.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top