Alternative RTG Fuel: Exploring Pb210, Pu241, Ac227, Cm242, and Pm147

  • Thread starter Thread starter dgjxqz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel
AI Thread Summary
Pu238 has limited production capacity, prompting interest in alternative isotopes like Pb210, Pu241, Ac227, Cm242, and Pm147 for radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs). Pb210 offers a longer half-life than Po210, making it suitable for medium lifespan missions, while Pu241 could provide a slight power boost similar to Am241. Ac227 is noted for its long decay chain, potentially yielding more power per atom, though mass production methods remain unclear. Cm242 is considered a viable alternative to Pu238, offering an early power boost, but questions about its production complexity persist. The discussion highlights the European Space Agency's shift towards Am-241 sources, which, despite lower power density, may be compensated for with improved RTG designs.
dgjxqz
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I heard that Pu238 has limited production capacity.
Apart from those widely discussed, I would be curious as of why these are rarely brought up:
  • Pb210 is essentially Po210 with a longer half-life, which is more suitable for medium lifespan missions. How much Pb210 can be collected from a lead cooled reactor?
  • Pu241 is essentially Am241, but it could give a slight power boost.
  • Ac227 has a long decay chain which gives more (most?) power per atom. Any novel way for mass production?
  • Cm242 is essentially Pu238, in addition to early power boost. Is it much harder to produce Pu238 this way?
  • Pm147 has been discussed, but some sources give an unreasonably low power density (<1w/g) for its short half-life. Are they mistaken, or there is something I don't understand?

My assumption is:
  1. spent fission fuel can be reprocessed promptly,
  2. further decay of daughter isotopes contribute to total power output.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
238Pu has a high-energetic alpha decay to a long-living daughter isotope (which has the same features again), that makes radiation shielding easy. Most other isotopes have beta decays or high probabilities for gamma decays in their chains.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
Yeah, but 90Sr had been used and 241Am is being considered. I forgot to mention another assumption where anything close or less should be acceptable.
 
I believe the European Space Agency has announced they will be moving to Am-241 sources. They're less power dense, but with better RTG designs that is more than compensated for.

It's long lived, so it can support any interstellar mission. It alpha decays, so shielding is relatively easy. Production is, from what I've been told, fairly simple. I mean we produce it for smoke detectors as it is so I can't imagine up-scaling that process would be too difficult.
 
Apollo16 said:
It's long lived, so it can support any interstellar mission.
Any interplanetary missions. It is way too short-living to support interstellar missions unless you aim for something like Breakthrough Starshot with ~20% c.

It is produced in nuclear reactors. You cannot simply scale up the number of nuclear power plants in the world. You can extract more of this isotope out of their waste, however.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top