Altitude where Earth's magnetic field will no longer affect a compass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Earth's magnetic field strength at the surface is approximately 0.5 Gauss (0.05 mT) and diminishes with distance according to the inverse square law. At an altitude of 10,000 meters, the magnetic field remains significant, retaining about 99.5% of its strength compared to the surface. The magnetosphere extends thousands of kilometers into space, influencing compass behavior even at high altitudes. Understanding the mathematics behind magnetic field strength is crucial for evaluating compass sensitivity in varying altitudes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Earth's magnetic field and its measurement in Gauss and Tesla.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of inverse square law and cubic distance decay.
  • Basic knowledge of magnetosphere and its effects on magnetic fields.
  • Mathematical skills to calculate magnetic field strength at different altitudes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical models for calculating magnetic field strength at various altitudes.
  • Explore the properties and applications of neodymium magnets and their magnetic field decay.
  • Study the effects of altitude on compass sensitivity and performance in aviation.
  • Investigate the structure and dynamics of the Earth's magnetosphere and its influence on navigation.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, geophysicists, and anyone interested in the principles of magnetism and navigation technology.

magnetics
Gold Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi,

The Earth's magnetic field at the surface is roughly 0.5 Gauss or 0.05 mT.

If the Earth's field strength diminishes in proportion to the inverse square of the distance, surely the field is going to be negligible at 10,000m altitude. Yet as far as I am aware it will still have an effect on the plane's compass traveling at such an altitude.

Can someone please help me out with the maths to explain this scenario?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi magnetics

maybe you don't realize that the Earth's magnetic field surrounds the Earth and extends out into space 1000's of kilometres ?
At 10,000m or even 100,000m you are still deep within the field

attachment.php?attachmentid=57875&stc=1&d=1365994286.jpg


The magneto tail stretches 100's of 1000's of km "down stream" of the Earth ( ie the opposite direction to the sun as seen in the above pic

do some googling on the Earth's magnetic field for tons of info and images :)Dave
 

Attachments

  • 7768391.jpg
    7768391.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 2,547
Last edited:
The Earth's magnetic field at the surface is roughly 0.5 Gauss or 0.05 mT.

from one of many google sources...

The Earth's magnetic field varies depending on your location on the Earth's surface. In regions near the magnetic poles, such as Siberia, Canada, and Antarctica, it can exceed 60 microteslas (0.6 gauss), whereas in regions farther away, such as South America and South Africa, is around 30 microteslas (0.3 gauss). Near the poles, the field strength diminishes with the inverse square of the distance, whereas at greater distances, such as in outer space, it diminishes with the cube of the distance. Where the prime meridian intersects with the equator, the field strength is about 31 microteslas.

The region where the Earth's magnetic field lines extend into space is called the magnetosphere, and influences the trajectories of the charged solar wind at distances exceeding 10 Earth radii. Solar wind, ejected from the Sun in all directions at great speeds, collides with the magnetosphere in a region called the bow shock. Like gravity, magnetism has an infinite range, although it diminishes so quickly with distance that its power at ranges much beyond 10 Earth radii is very low.

Dave
 
Thank you Dave,
I was aware that the magnetosphere extends many km into space.
But I would like to see the maths used to calculate the approximate strength of the Earth's field at 10km altitude.
With regard to the sensitivity of a compass, I suspect it's about the quality of the compass and the force required to overcome the friction to turn the needle?
On the face of it, I would have thought it very difficult to make a compass sensitive enough to turn in a very weak magnetic field 10km up? That's where I was looking for some help in the maths department.
Thanks,
 
I don't know for sure without reading up about it
But I would expect the field would be stronger at that height for for some distance after all you are still deep within the field ...

We both really need an expert answer on this one :)

Dave
 
magnetics said:
The Earth's magnetic field at the surface is roughly 0.5 Gauss or 0.05 mT.

If the Earth's field strength diminishes in proportion to the inverse square of the distance, surely the field is going to be negligible at 10,000m altitude.
Use the centre of the Earth as the point from which you measure the distance, not the surface.
If the field at R is 0.5 Gauss, then it's going to be 1/4th of that at 2R, i.e., ~6370km above the surface. Compare with your 10km high scenario.
 
lots of searching google tonite and quite difficult to find specific answers
but in this PDF file ...
http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/fys/FYS3610/h04/undervisningsmateriale/Chapter%202_2708.pdf

and deep into the info I found this ...

As long as we are located on the earth’s surface, r=R and the quantity (R/r)3 equals 1.
But if we travel away from the earth’s surface, r increases, and the dipole field decreases. The reduction behaves like the third power of the distance; i.e., for r=2R (R ≈ 6500km) the field is just about 0.125 (12.5%) of the field at the earth’s surface.

Dave
 
Wow, thanks for the effort Dave. That's starting to make sense now.
If at 2R (6,500km) the field is still at 12.5%, then at R+10km it must be very close to 99.5%.
{Although, according to Bandersnatch, shouldn't it be 1/4 (25%) and not 1/8 (12.5%)}

I wonder how this would relate to a very powerful spherical neodymium magnet of say r = 15mm with a surface magnetic field strength of 3,500 Gauss or 0.35T?
 
Last edited:
The field is a dipole one so presumably would fall off as 1/r^3 once you were far enough away from the generator structure?
 
  • #10
{Although, according to Bandersnatch, shouldn't it be 1/4 (25%) and not 1/8 (12.5%)}
Disregard my earlier statement regarding that bit, it was incorrect. The field falls like 1/R3, as others have been saying.

Lately I'm getting better and better at putting my foot in my mouth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
32K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K