MHB Amanda's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a solid of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of the solid formed by rotating the area between the curves y=4x-x^2 and y=x about the y-axis using the cylindrical shells method. The limits of integration are determined to be x=0 and x=3, leading to the volume formula V=2π∫(3x^2-x^3)dx from 0 to 3, resulting in a volume of 27π/2. An alternative approach using the washer method is also presented, confirming the same volume through two separate integrals. Both methods yield consistent results, demonstrating the reliability of the calculations. The conversation encourages further calculus inquiries from participants.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus homework help?

Using the cylindrical shells method of integral calculus...what is the the volume bounded between y=4x-x^2 and y=x after a rotation across the y axis? Thank you!

Here is a link to the question:

Calculus homework help? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello amanda,

The first thing I like to do is create a sketch of the region to be revolved:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/855._xfImport

Now, let's first determine the limits of integration by equating the two curves:

$$4x-x^2=x$$

Write in standard quadratic form:

$$x^2-3x=0$$

Factor:

$$x(x-3)=0$$

Hence $$x=0,\,3$$.

Now, the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dx$$ where

$$r=x$$

$$h=4x-x^2-x=3x-x^2$$

and so we have:

$$dV=2\pi x\left(3x-x^2 \right)\,dx=2\pi\left(3x^2-x^3 \right)\,dx$$

Now, summing the shells, we find:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^3 3x^2-x^3\,dx$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the fundamental theorem of calculus, there results:

$$V=2\pi\left[x^3-\frac{1}{4}x^4 \right]_0^3=2\pi\left(3^3-\frac{3^4}{4} \right)=54\pi\left(1-\frac{3}{4} \right)=\frac{27\pi}{2}$$

I like to check my work by using another technique, and in this case we may use the washer method. This will mean setting up two integrals, one in which the line is the outer radius, and another in which the right side of the parabola is the outer radius. The left side of the parabola is the inner radius in both cases. We will need to solve the parabola for $x$. Writing it in vertex form, we have:

$$y=-(x-2)^2+4$$

$$(x-2)^2=4-y$$

$$x-2=\pm\sqrt{4-y}$$

$$x=2\pm\sqrt{4-y}$$

Interval 1: $$0\le y\le3$$

The volume of an arbitrary washer is

$$dV_1=\pi(R^2-r^2)\,dy$$ where:

$$R=y$$

$$r=2-\sqrt{4-y}$$

and so we have:

$$dV_1=\pi\left(y^2+y+4\sqrt{4-y}-8 \right)\,dy$$

Summing by integration:

$$V_1=\pi\int_0^3 y^2+y+4\sqrt{4-y}-8\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the fundamental theorem of calculus, there results:

$$V_1=\pi\left[\frac{1}{3}y^3+\frac{1}{2}y^2-\frac{8}{3}(4-y)^{\frac{3}{2}}-8y \right]_0^3=\pi\left(\left(9+\frac{9}{2}-\frac{8}{3}-24 \right)-\left(-\frac{64}{3} \right) \right)=\frac{49\pi}{6}$$

Interval 2: $$3\le y\le4$$

The volume of an arbitrary washer is

$$dV_2=\pi(R^2-r^2)\,dy$$ where:

$$R=2+\sqrt{4-y}$$

$$r=2-\sqrt{4-y}$$

and so we have:

$$dV_2=8\pi\sqrt{4-y}\,dy$$

Summing by integration:

$$V_2=8\pi\int_3^4\sqrt{4-y}\,dy$$

Applying the anti-derivative form of the fundamental theorem of calculus, there results:

$$V_2=-\frac{16\pi}{3}\left[(4-y)^{\frac{3}{2}} \right]_3^4=-\frac{16\pi}{3}\left(0-1 \right)=\frac{16\pi}{3}$$

Now, adding the two volumes, we find:

$$V=V_1+V_2=\frac{49\pi}{6}+\frac{16\pi}{3}=\frac{27\pi}{2}$$

This agrees with the result we found using the shell method.

To amanda and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other calculus questions here in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 

Attachments

  • amanda.jpg
    amanda.jpg
    8.4 KB · Views: 88
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top