Ambient temperature energy generation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of extracting electricity from the heat released by a compressor in a heat pump system. It is established that while heat pumps can generate more energy than they consume, the laws of thermodynamics dictate that one cannot extract more energy than what is input into the system. The conversation highlights that attempting to achieve a coefficient of performance (COP) greater than 1.0, coupled with high efficiency in energy extraction, is fundamentally flawed. Ultimately, the consensus is that such a device is impossible and economically unviable due to the inherent inefficiencies in energy conversion processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics and the laws of energy conservation
  • Familiarity with heat pump and heat engine efficiency equations
  • Knowledge of the coefficient of performance (COP) in thermodynamic systems
  • Basic principles of energy conversion and entropy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics, focusing on the laws of energy conservation and entropy
  • Explore heat pump and heat engine efficiency equations to understand their interdependence
  • Investigate real-world applications of heat pumps and their performance metrics
  • Learn about advancements in energy extraction technologies and their limitations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and energy researchers interested in thermodynamics, heat pump technology, and the feasibility of energy extraction methods.

beamthegreat
Messages
116
Reaction score
7
It is known that heat pumps create more energy than it consumes due to moving "heat" from one place to another. For example, if an air conditioner consumes 100 watts, the compressor will release 120 watts of heat since the heat in the room will be transferred to the compressor.

Would it then be possible to extract the energy released from the compressor to generate electricity? This doesn't violate the conservation of energy since the energy is derived from the ambient temperature (The net temperature in the atmosphere will decrease to compensate for the energy we obtain).

Is this logic flawed? Would such a device be possible and economically viable?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Would it then be possible to extract the energy released from the compressor to generate electricity?
Not more than the compressor needs. The same advantage you have for heat pumps is a disadvantage for the opposite direction.

This doesn't violate the conservation of energy
It would reduce entropy, which is against the laws of physics, too.

No, such a device is impossible. There is no loophole, it is pointless to ask "would it work if ...?".
 
mfb said:
Not more than the compressor needs. The same advantage you have for heat pumps is a disadvantage for the opposite direction.

Why wouldn't it? A normal compressor would generate the same amount of energy as it would consume. Of course, we cannot extract as much energy as it needs since the generator or heat engine cannot be 100% efficient and some energy is loss as sound, EM radiation, vibrations, etc. However, the total energy released from the system must equal the energy we put into the compressor.

Now if we used this compressor to move heat from the outside air into the machine, there would be more energy that it started with. Suppose the energy it release is 115% and is released as heat. Could we use the best technology we currently have to extracte 90% of the 115% of the energy it consume back as electricity? We would then have 3.5% energy left.

Could anyone explain how this logic is flawed?
 
beamthegreat said:
Why wouldn't it?
The efficiency of heat engines and heat pumps are opposite functions of temperature difference: a greater temperature difference increases the efficiency of the heat engine, but decreases the efficiency of the heat pump.
Now if we used this compressor to move heat from the outside air into the machine, there would be more energy that it started with. Suppose the energy it release is 115% and is released as heat. Could we use the best technology we currently have to extracte 90% of the 115% of the energy it consume back as electricity? We would then have 3.5% energy left.

Could anyone explain how this logic is flawed?
Logic explained above. For the numbers, rather than pulling them out of the air, you should plug them into the heat pump and heat engine efficiency equations. Then you'll see that you can't have a 115% COP coupled with a 90% efficiency.
 
Alright thanks. I now realized how flawed this idea is. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K