Amplification for Action Potentials

AI Thread Summary
A Faraday box has been constructed to detect action potentials and local field potentials from the brain, but noise interference is a concern. The user seeks advice on strategies to minimize this noise, particularly regarding the proximity of wires from two Aris Amplifiers. Suggestions include contacting the vendor, Neurostar, for application notes and technical support, as recording techniques are well-established. The discussion highlights the need for more detailed information about the experimental setup to diagnose the noise issue effectively. Engaging in forums can be challenging for complex problems, but community input may still provide valuable insights.
arrektor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have constructed a Faraday box containing electrodes that are going to detect the action potentials or/and local field potentials from inside the brain.

I was wondering whether someone constructed something like this before and what strategies were used to reduce the noise reaching the electrodes.

Specifically, at random instances noise appears that is not obvious how it was induced.

I am using 2 Aris Amplifiers (neurostar) and I am wondering if there is noise induced when the wires of the two Amplifiers are close to each other?

Any ideas will be really helpful.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diagnosing your problem will require a great deal more information about your apparatus, experiment, lead placement, signal levels, nature of the noise, etc., than you have provided. However, recording EEG's and even action potentials is a mature technique whose principles are well understood. I suggest that you contact your vendor Neurostar for assistance. They should have application notes to describe proper technique, and applications engineers to help you with your issues. You are welcome to come back here as well, of course, although a forum is an awkward way to interact over complex matters.
 
Thank you very much.

In fact, I tried to contact the company but I did not have any response for some time, so I supposed that I could give a go to this forum.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top