Amplification for Action Potentials

AI Thread Summary
A Faraday box has been constructed to detect action potentials and local field potentials from the brain, but noise interference is a concern. The user seeks advice on strategies to minimize this noise, particularly regarding the proximity of wires from two Aris Amplifiers. Suggestions include contacting the vendor, Neurostar, for application notes and technical support, as recording techniques are well-established. The discussion highlights the need for more detailed information about the experimental setup to diagnose the noise issue effectively. Engaging in forums can be challenging for complex problems, but community input may still provide valuable insights.
arrektor
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have constructed a Faraday box containing electrodes that are going to detect the action potentials or/and local field potentials from inside the brain.

I was wondering whether someone constructed something like this before and what strategies were used to reduce the noise reaching the electrodes.

Specifically, at random instances noise appears that is not obvious how it was induced.

I am using 2 Aris Amplifiers (neurostar) and I am wondering if there is noise induced when the wires of the two Amplifiers are close to each other?

Any ideas will be really helpful.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diagnosing your problem will require a great deal more information about your apparatus, experiment, lead placement, signal levels, nature of the noise, etc., than you have provided. However, recording EEG's and even action potentials is a mature technique whose principles are well understood. I suggest that you contact your vendor Neurostar for assistance. They should have application notes to describe proper technique, and applications engineers to help you with your issues. You are welcome to come back here as well, of course, although a forum is an awkward way to interact over complex matters.
 
Thank you very much.

In fact, I tried to contact the company but I did not have any response for some time, so I supposed that I could give a go to this forum.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top