Amplitude Modulation equation help

AI Thread Summary
Amplitude modulation in sound synthesis involves using one frequency to modulate the amplitude of another, resulting in a carrier frequency and two additional signals known as the sum and difference frequencies. The equation for this process is presented, but the user seeks assistance in applying it to specific data pairs to calculate instantaneous amplitude. Suggestions include using a spreadsheet to input constants and time values, allowing for easier calculations without needing to solve trigonometric problems directly. A correction is noted regarding an equation from a referenced source, emphasizing the use of the original equation for clarity. The discussion concludes with a positive response to the advice given.
dmorr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I am trying to understand the phenomena behind the technique of using amplitude modulation in sound synthesis. When you have two frequencies, for example, w1=200hz and w2=300hz, and you use the amplitude of one (w1) to modulate the amplitude of the other (w2), it creates 3 signals, one of which is the original carrier frequency, plus 2 others which are called the "sum" and "difference".

you can read more about it here:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar00/articles/synthsecrets.htm

Anyways, to get the point here... the equation to explain this looks like this:


A1= a1cos(w1t)) + 1/2 [a2cos(w1+w2)t] + 1/2[a2cos(w1-w2)t]

so "1" is the carrier and "2" is the modulator frequency

A= instantaneous amplitude
a= maximum amplitude possible (just using an arbitrary unit here)
w= frequency
t= time


It's probably a basic trigonometry equation, but I haven't done trig since high school, and it's all a blur. What my goal is is to compare two sets of outcomes of data going through this equation. I just don't know how to do the math, so if someone could help me plug in these pairs of data into the equation, that would be awesome.

I want to compare the outcome of this carrier and modulator pair with another.

1. FIRST PAIR>> carrier: a1 = 100, w1= 100hz, t=3 seconds (also arbitrary)
modulator: a2 = 50, w2= 1hz, t =3

2. SECOND PAIR>> carrier: a1 = 100, w1= 100hz, t=3 seconds (also arbitrary)
modulator: a2 = 50, w2= 80hz, t =3

I would like to see what the instantaneous amplitude of the carriers would be in each cases, ideally it would be better if someone could just explain to me how to do the math, and then I could do a bunch of calculation myself.

Thank you so much if someone is able to help me.

dylan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you drop these formulae into a spreadsheet and graph the result?
Btw, Eqn 4 at the link you provided is wrong. It's OK in Eqn 5.
 
haruspex said:
Why don't you drop these formulae into a spreadsheet and graph the result?

Because I don't know how to solve trigonometry problems. So even though I have the data and the equation, I am not able to plug in numbers into it and find the instantaneous amplitude of the carrier.

Since you were able to recognize that the equation in the link was wrong haruspex would you be able to put one of my pairs of data into the equation and show your work so I can do the rest on a spreadsheet graph myself?

cheers,

dmorr
 
I don't understand why you think you have to solve any trig.
Create cells for the constants, a1, aq2, w1, w2.
Create a column for time, the first being 0, the rest being "above cell + .01".
Put the formula in the next column, and away you go.

Btw, you don't need to use eqn 5. You can use the original eqn:
(a1 + a2.cos(w2.t)).cos(w1.t)
The point of eqn 5 is to reveal certain properties.
 
sweet, i will do that. thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top