Amplitude of 2 waves at a point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the amplitude of two sound waves originating from in-phase sources oscillating at 500Hz. The original poster presents a scenario where the distances from the sources to a point are 5m and 5.17m, respectively, and seeks to determine the resultant amplitude at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the use of different time values for the two waves, suggesting that the waves should be considered at the same time. There is a discussion about fixing the spatial position while allowing time to vary to observe wave behavior. Some participants explore the addition of cosine functions and the conditions under which this can yield the correct amplitude.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem of finding the amplitude. There is an exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, and some participants are attempting to derive conditions for maximum amplitude. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct method or final answer yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's calculations may have included errors, particularly in the arithmetic involved in determining time values. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the correct values are used in the equations to find the resultant amplitude.

Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Two sound sources oscillate in phase at 500Hz with the same amplitude sm. At a point 5m from source 1 and 5.17m from source 2, what is the amplitude?

Homework Equations


s(x,t)=sm*cos(kx-wt)
w=2πf
Speed of sound=340m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


v=340m/s
w=2πf=1000π rad/s
k=w/v=50π/17
t1=5m/340m/s=1/68s
t2=5.17m/340m/s=0.0152s

s1(5,1/68)=sm*cos(50π/17*5-1000π*1/68)
s2(5.17, 0.0152)=sm*cos(50π/15*5.17-1000π*0.0152)

Adding the two together I get ~2sm, the correct answer is 1.41sm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How come you're using two different times? The waves act at the same time right? It doesn't make much sense for one wave to interfere with the future of the other wave.

Anyway you don't want to plug a specific time-value in for the waves. Doing that gives you the displacement of the wave at a fixed position in space and a fixed instant in time.
You only want to fix the spatial position, but leave the time variable there because you want to watch how the wave acts over time (in that specific spot).

Fix the spatial position so that the wave displacement only depends on time, then find the amplitude of the resulting wave.

(The times you calculated are how long it will take for the sound to reach the point after the speaker is turned on. But that's not relevant, as long as we assume it's been long enough for both waves to reach the point.)
 
Nathanael said:
How come you're using two different times? The waves act at the same time right? It doesn't make much sense for one wave to interfere with the future of the other wave.

Anyway you don't want to plug a specific time-value in for the waves. Doing that gives you the displacement of the wave at a fixed position in space and a fixed instant in time.
You only want to fix the spatial position, but leave the time variable there because you want to watch how the wave acts over time (in that specific spot).

Fix the spatial position so that the wave displacement only depends on time, then find the amplitude of the resulting wave.

(The times you calculated are how long it will take for the sound to reach the point after the speaker is turned on. But that's not relevant, as long as we assume it's been long enough for both waves to reach the point.)

Okay so I rewrote the two equations as:
s(5.00, t)=sm*cos(50π/17*5-wt)
s(5.17, t)=sm*cos(50π/17*5.17-wt)
I set t=0 after this and added the two cos functions together which gave the correct answer, is this correct?
 
How did you "add the cos functions"? Remember, their value varies over time so picking one instant and summing the then-current values of the cos functions won't give you the magnitude of the wave unless you're very lucky indeed and happened to pick an instant n time that corresponds to the maximum.

What will work is solving for a value of t that corresponds to a maximum of the sum.
 
gneill said:
How did you "add the cos functions"? Remember, their value varies over time so picking one instant and summing the then-current values of the cos functions won't give you the magnitude of the wave unless you're very lucky indeed and happened to pick an instant n time that corresponds to the maximum.

What will work is solving for a value of t that corresponds to a maximum of the sum.

I added them like: cos(a)+cos(b)=constant
I did this because the 2 waves are in-phase so the 2 amplitudes should add together. I'm not sure how to solve for a value of t that will give a maximum since if I take the derivative I will need the speed of the function.
 
Your cos(a) and cos(b) will not be constant over time. At any given location in space they will both vary through the maximum range of their amplitudes. So you can't just pick an arbitrary time t and hope that it corresponds to a maximum.

You have a function ##f(t) = cos(k_1 x_1 - ω t) + cos(k_2 x_2 - ω t)##, where since you have a fixed location the x's are constants. You can differentiate this w.r.t. t to find a maximum (or minimum, either will yield the amplitude).
 
gneill said:
Your cos(a) and cos(b) will not be constant over time. At any given location in space they will both vary through the maximum range of their amplitudes. So you can't just pick an arbitrary time t and hope that it corresponds to a maximum.

You have a function ##f(t) = cos(k_1 x_1 - ω t) + cos(k_2 x_2 - ω t)##, where since you have a fixed location the x's are constants. You can differentiate this w.r.t. t to find a maximum (or minimum, either will yield the amplitude).

After differentiating this with respect to time I got t=(k2x2+k1x1)/(2w)=0.00476s
When I plugged this time back into my equations I got the wrong answer so I'm guessing I'm doing something wrong.
 
Can you show your work?

EDIT: Actually, you're expression looks okay. Check your arithmetic (assuming you plugged in the correct values for the x's and w).
 
Last edited:
Y
gneill said:
Can you show your work?

EDIT: Actually, you're expression looks okay. Check your arithmetic (assuming you plugged in the correct values for the x's and w).
Yea sorry I would've posted all the work but I'm on my phone so it's kind of difficult. I messed up plugging the values into solve for t, it's actually equal to 0.0149s. It worked! Thanks for the help I needed quite a lot of it on this question haha
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K