An abundant cheap dense liquid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gloo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for dense yet abundant liquids, with participants exploring options like mercury, ferrofluids, molten lead, and barium sulfate. Mercury is identified as the densest liquid but poses safety challenges, while ferrofluids are noted for their switchable properties but are costly. The feasibility of achieving high densities in ferrofluids, potentially up to 10g/cm³, is debated, with references to the need for magnetic fields to enhance density. Barium sulfate and bentonite are suggested as alternatives for high-density applications, although their solubility and mixing challenges are acknowledged.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of liquid density concepts
  • Familiarity with ferrofluids and their properties
  • Knowledge of barium sulfate and its applications
  • Basic principles of fluid dynamics and buoyancy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of ferrofluids
  • Investigate the safety and handling procedures for mercury
  • Explore the use of barium sulfate in drilling fluids
  • Learn about fluid dynamics in buoyancy and pressure applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, physicists, and researchers interested in fluid dynamics, material science, and applications involving dense liquids in various industries.

  • #31
Mercury is rare, expensive, toxic and probably illegal to owe.

Baluncore has a neat idea: some sort of mud. It's not very dense, but it's denser than water. You can go one step further and put iron powder into it. The idea is to mix substances with increasing densities, so they can hold each other. But they will precipitate sooner or later.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gloo
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Gigel said:
Mercury is rare, expensive, toxic and probably illegal to owe.

Baluncore has a neat idea: some sort of mud. It's not very dense, but it's denser than water. You can go one step further and put iron powder into it. The idea is to mix substances with increasing densities, so they can hold each other. But they will precipitate sooner or later.

In the oil drilling business, they inject something called drilling mud down the hole to seal it up while drilling. It needs to be dense, so a suspension of barium sulfate (insoluble in water ) is a component of the mud. I wouldn't be surprised if drilling is where most of our barium resources go.
 
  • #33
About 80% of BaSO4 is used for drilling, according to Wikipedia.
 
  • #34
The density of drilling mud is increased so that rock chips from the mechanical drilling are buoyant in the flowing mud. As mud is pumped down the centre of the drill string, the rock chips float in the circulating mud up the hole outside the drill string. The pressure of the column of drilling mud in the hole opposes the hydrostatic fluid pressure in the rock and so reduces blow-outs. Bigger is not always better. Drillers despair when they get the mud density too high as the overly expensive mud goes down the hole to be lost in the rock formations below.

Engineering involves solving real problems in an economical way. The problem with this thread was that rather than having a specific problem to solve, the OP was considering the wider possible complexities of buoyancy in differential density fluids. Neither toxic mercury nor expensive drilling mud can be engineered to solve an unspecified problem. Indeed, most engineering effort goes into identifying the problem and the specifications required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
716
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K