An abundant cheap dense liquid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gloo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the search for a dense yet abundant liquid, with mercury being a primary candidate due to its high density but safety concerns. Ferrofluids are also considered, though their cost and potential densities raise questions, with estimates suggesting they can reach around 3.4 g/cm³, possibly more under specific conditions. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the intended application, particularly regarding layering liquids for buoyancy or displacement purposes. Alternatives like barium sulfate and bentonite are suggested, but their properties and practical implications are debated. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexities of selecting a suitable dense liquid for various applications while addressing safety and environmental concerns.
  • #31
Mercury is rare, expensive, toxic and probably illegal to owe.

Baluncore has a neat idea: some sort of mud. It's not very dense, but it's denser than water. You can go one step further and put iron powder into it. The idea is to mix substances with increasing densities, so they can hold each other. But they will precipitate sooner or later.
 
  • Like
Likes gloo
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Gigel said:
Mercury is rare, expensive, toxic and probably illegal to owe.

Baluncore has a neat idea: some sort of mud. It's not very dense, but it's denser than water. You can go one step further and put iron powder into it. The idea is to mix substances with increasing densities, so they can hold each other. But they will precipitate sooner or later.

In the oil drilling business, they inject something called drilling mud down the hole to seal it up while drilling. It needs to be dense, so a suspension of barium sulfate (insoluble in water ) is a component of the mud. I wouldn't be surprised if drilling is where most of our barium resources go.
 
  • #33
About 80% of BaSO4 is used for drilling, according to Wikipedia.
 
  • #34
The density of drilling mud is increased so that rock chips from the mechanical drilling are buoyant in the flowing mud. As mud is pumped down the centre of the drill string, the rock chips float in the circulating mud up the hole outside the drill string. The pressure of the column of drilling mud in the hole opposes the hydrostatic fluid pressure in the rock and so reduces blow-outs. Bigger is not always better. Drillers despair when they get the mud density too high as the overly expensive mud goes down the hole to be lost in the rock formations below.

Engineering involves solving real problems in an economical way. The problem with this thread was that rather than having a specific problem to solve, the OP was considering the wider possible complexities of buoyancy in differential density fluids. Neither toxic mercury nor expensive drilling mud can be engineered to solve an unspecified problem. Indeed, most engineering effort goes into identifying the problem and the specifications required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
472
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K