An embarrassing question: what were the boundaries of the universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter houhou.trad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the universe's boundaries and its expansion. It posits that the universe may have always been infinite, even at the moment of the Big Bang, suggesting there was never a finite state. If the universe is finite, it still lacks boundaries, as reaching an edge would simply lead back to the starting point, similar to sailing around the Earth. The concept of an infinite universe expanding is explained by the increasing distance between objects within it. Overall, the universe is described as continuously expanding, regardless of its infinite or finite status.
houhou.trad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I say always that the universe has expanded, from an initially-hot and dense state, until it get its current forme...
But it will be very natural to ask the question: at the first instances of its expansion, what were the boundaries of this universe, and what were the exterior of this boundaries..?
Can someone explain me this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
We're actually not sure if it's infinite or not (according to Marcus, and the FAQ, the current data fits both infinite and finite models, pretty much equally well), but:

-If the universe is infinite, then it was already infinite at the point of the Big Bang; there was never a time that it was finite.

-If the universe is finite, it still does not (and never did) have boundaries. What happens when you reach the edge of the universe? Well, you never reach an edge; try this and you'll only end up back where you started (rather like as if you tried to sail to the edge of the earth).

-In either case, it is expanding. One may wonder: if the infinite universe is true, how would an already infinite space expand further? Well, all the things in it just keep getting further away from each other.
 
Thank you narrator and cephron, I think the idea is now somewhat more clear.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top