alt
Gold Member
- 222
- 0
arildno said:It is a totalitarian, and deeply immoral misunderstanding that if we can't save everyone then we are in no position to feel relief that SOME were saved.
Furthermore, if we have limited resources, and one group cannot be saved unless we choose not to save another, we are STILL entitled to feel relieved at those we DID save.
I agree entirely.
Someone commented earlier in this thread 'why didn't the government give the money to starving children in Africa' or something like that. What a peculiar attitude !
By that measure, all expenditure, other than for basic existence, should be given to the poorest. What a world that would be !