7.0 earthquake hits Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Earthquake
In summary: OK.Wow, so glad to hear you're OK, apeiron! I'm curious, is your house made of wood? That's what most buildings are made of here in the quake-prone Seattle area. It's soooo flexible in an earthquake, yet remains structurally sound. And no deaths that I've heard, that's really fantastic. A moment of grateful silence for Civil Engineers... and everyone else in the area who helped make sure we were all OK.
  • #106
rhody said:
Apeiron, Astro, nismara,

You have to check this out: from: http://www.isgtw.org/visualization/visualizing-vectors" ...

This new seismic simulation tool is really, really cool, I will add a few key phrases:
  • procedural dipole textured
  • intuitive ground swell motion
  • wave amplification
  • display of flow like nature of seismic waves

There are other applications for this technology as well, Astrophysics...

Click the embedded video...

I think you will be impressed, I know I was.

Rhody... :cool:

Now that is just amazing...

@Astronuc: Now that is just depressing as hell, *string of curses in Russian and English*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #107
Astronuc said:
I will have to navigate that later.

Meanwhile - http://www.isgtw.org/feature/feature-sixty-seconds-save-city

It seems that the Canterbury plains will be active for some time.

Astro,

Their response, quite smart...

To provide an early warning, about 100 earthquake sensor stations dot the island. But accumulating data from all of them and then assessing the information takes time. So, a more nimble method was introduced a few years ago, based on gathering data in so-called “virtual sub-nets” — groups of sensors spanning regions of 50km or so. If these sensors confirm a major quake, they can sound the alarm right away, without having to verify what the rest of the entire network has detected.

For quakes which originate in the south and east of the island — the most active areas — this deceptively simple strategy triples the warning time for metropolitan Taipei, from 20 seconds to nearly 60 seconds.
and
So it’s simply not viable to shut down power plants and stop trains every time a tremor is detected. What is needed is a quick prediction of the impact that a particular quake may have on key infrastructures across the island.

But the amount of shaking that an earthquake can produce a hundred or so kilometers from its point of origin can vary strongly, depending upon, for example, the depth at which it occurs.

There is certainly no time to do a full simulation once the first hint of an earthquake is detected. However, according to Li Zhao of the Institute of Earth Sciences at Academia Sinica, it is possible to pull out a pre-processed simulation from a database and make a quick decision based on what it predicts. This requires processing and storing the results of simulations for a huge number of possible quake epicenters, a task well-suited to grids.

Pretty advanced thinking, I must say...

Rhody... :cool:
 
  • #108
Wow, just woke up to http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110311-704208.html" news...
TOKYO (Dow Jones)--A massive 8.9-magnitude earthquake struck Japan Friday, causing untold death and damage to the northeast and panic as far south as Tokyo, with an ensuing tsunami devastating coastal areas in the north.

An early death toll in Japan's worst quake was 23, broadcaster NHK said, but the number was sure to rise as communications were cut off to some of the worst-hit areas in the north and helicopter footage showed tsunami waters racing across rice fields, dragging houses and vehicles in their wake.

The quake hit at 0546 GMT and originally was reported at a magnitude of 7.9, but later was upgraded to 8.9. That makes it the fifth largest recorded worldwide since 1900, according to the U.S. Geological Service.

It is far larger than the 7.9-magnitude Great Kanto Earthquake that devastated Tokyo in 1923, killing 143,000, or the 6.8-magnitude quake that hit Kobe in 1995, killing 5,502.
and
A tsunami measured at anywhere from one meter to 7.3 meters hit at various places along the coast, while a 10-meter tsunami was seen at the port in Sendai, near the epicenter, Kyodo reported.

A tsunami warning extended to at least 50 nations and territories, including the U.S. West Coast and parts of South America, and evacuations were ordered in Hawaii.

A Meteorological Agency official appeared on TV urging those affected by the quake not to return home because of possible tsunamis.

"In some areas we have issued a warning of tsunamis of higher than 10 meters and we expect these areas will experience the high water levels soon," said the official. "Please stay on high alert."

http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=massive+earthquake".

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/11/japan.quake/?hpt=T2"

Rhody...

P.S. I knew it was serious when an alert was splashed at the bottom of the google home page... They hardly ever do that. Let's hope it was not near the surface like the one in New Zealand. They are recommending everyone get 1/2 mile up the coast in Hawaii, waves are expected to arrive (from news) 8 am EST. Someone, please wake up Garrett please... The news is saying they are sounding tsunami alarms in Hawaii. Thank God...

Look at the picture (thumbnail) I just added, that is a 4 story building in the hook of the wave. OMG...
 

Attachments

  • wave.jpg
    wave.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 378
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #109
Another aftershock less than an hour ago, reported as 5.5magnitude.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9629693/significant-aftershock-rocks-christchurch/

"The latest aftershock to hit Christchurch has apparently caused a building to collapse."
- http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9629954
 
  • #110
And another aftershock half an hour ago @ 2.30pm - 6.0 magnitude. 2.40pm - 4.9magnitude.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/9630497
 
  • #111
So far no reports of deaths, thankfully. Hang on, Kiwis!
 
  • #112
lisab said:
So far no reports of deaths, thankfully. Hang on, Kiwis!

Yes, no deaths reported, some injuries, some more building collapses, some hillsides gone and lots more liquefaction.

The 6.0 said to be 8 on Mercali scale compared to the Feb 22 6.3 which was a 9. This one happened just out to sea where the fault is now know to extend a little distance.

Already in the quakes, about third of the city has been badly affected by liquefaction (Christchurch was built on old swamp) and half the buildings in the central business district are finished. The ground had already sunk by about a metre in riverside areas so that perhaps 10k homes will have to be moved to new ground.

We know now that the region is laced with M6 and M7 faults. But even so, the quake risk for Christchurch going forward is still less than, for example, our capital Wellington. Or Tokyo, Portland, and many other cities.

The experience of other cities also suggests that the rebuilt Christchurch will be much improved (it already ranked high on the scale). So check back in 10 years time. :smile:
 
  • #113
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10731968

Last Monday, there was a 5.5 mag, and now the mag 5.5 and 6 quakes.
http://quake.crowe.co.nz/

Ouch - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/image.cfm?c_id=1&gal_cid=1&gallery_id=119463#7713060 - used to be a great view from the living room.

There seems to be quite a bit of activity along the W. Pacific from NZ to the Kuriles. The swarm near Fukushima continues with several mag 5+ quakes. A mild swarm started up in Papua New Guinea.

There is some activity on the eastern side of the Pacific from S. Mexico to Panama.

And there is some rare activity in Eritrea-Ethiopia area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #114
Yesterday's shakes have been upgraded in strength...

The largest earthquake has been upgraded to magnitude 6.3, with a shallower depth of 6km. The 2.20pm quake was originally analysed as 6.0 in magnitude at a depth of 9km.

The 1.01pm tremor has also been upgraded [from 5] to 5.7, and was at a depth of 10km - not 11km - new GNS figures show.

Haven't worked out whether that is good or bad news yet :smile:.
 
  • #115
Thre was mag 5.4 on 21-Jun 10:34pm at a depth of 8.28 km. It is rated Mercalli VI with an energy release equivalent to ~2 kilo tonnes.

http://quake.crowe.co.nz/QuakeEnergy/

Quake hit homes: details tomorrow
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10733711

Some folks will have to abandon their homes.

The seismic activity has changed around Christchurch since Sept 4, 2010.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #116
The financial impact of the quakes is also impressive. The current bill is 8 percent of national GDP, compared to 2 percent for the recent Japanese tsunami/meltdown event and 1 percent for Hurricane Katrina.

But NZ is also unusually well-insured for these events and Christchurch will enjoy eventually the dividend of a massive rebuild operation (economy will be booming even if the place is a city-size building site).
 
  • #117
apeiron said:
The financial impact of the quakes is also impressive. The current bill is 8 percent of national GDP, compared to 2 percent for the recent Japanese tsunami/meltdown event and 1 percent for Hurricane Katrina.

But NZ is also unusually well-insured for these events and Christchurch will enjoy eventually the dividend of a massive rebuild operation (economy will be booming even if the place is a city-size building site).
I wonder how and where the rebuilding will occur. The seismic hazard potential has changed considerably around Christchurch and the Canterbury Plains. The question to be pondering is, "What has changed and for how long?"

The fault system from Darfield to Sumner and off the coast has become much more active, and demonstrates the potential for mag 6+ quakes.

Note the substantial change in frequency and magnitude of quakes since Sept 4, 2010. The figure shows earthquake magnitude as a function of date+time from beginning of 2007 to through June 21, 2011.
 

Attachments

  • NZ-earthquakes-2007-2011.png
    NZ-earthquakes-2007-2011.png
    33.9 KB · Views: 402
  • #118
Astronuc said:
I wonder how and where the rebuilding will occur.

There was a first big announcement yesterday. A lot of land around the Avon River has sunk below sea level so some 5000 households will be paid out by government and move to new subdivisions. Another 5000 are likely to follow (out of a town of some 120,000 homes).

The central city has lost half its shops, hotels and office buildings at least. The rebuild plan should be decided by Xmas (safely after our next general election).

As to seismic activity, this is now being treated as an ongoing event :smile:. There is a chain reaction going on because the land is filled with smallish (up to mag 7) faultlines. Originally it was thought the tensions would play themselves out in months, now it looks like years.

This is new science as it is the first time this kind of fault structure has been so intensely followed. Most seismology is based on the main continental plate faults (like our Alpine fault). The Christchurch stuff has been the disturbance of an area off to the side which might only switch on every 50,000 years or more.

It could have happened in many other places in the world with a similar geology. Portland I have mentioned. And something like it happened off the San Andreas in the 90s, but I think out towards the desert where no one much cared.

So this is a kind of event that is more unpredictable it seems because human civilisation is recent enough it hasn't hit a sizeable city before (and one a third build on liquefaction prone swamps, and the hillsides of the rocky rim of a big volcano).

At least the volcano here is definitely extinct.
 
  • #119
Sometimes extinct volcanos come back to life, or they get new neighbors.

Something has decidedly change in near Christchurch. Think about the consequences of a new magma bubble/chamber rising under Christchurch. I hope someone is looking at changes in gravity and local magnetic field.

The western Pacific Ring of Fire has become more active since I've been watching for the last 6 years.

Don't bet on an extinct volcano remaining extinct.

Interestingly, the Eritrea volcano Nabro apparently has no recorded history of eruption! It is first recorded (witnessed by humans) eruption of that volcano.
http://www.irishweatheronline.com/news/earthquakesvolcanos/first-footage-emerges-of-eritrean-volcanic-eruption/21037.html
 
  • #120
Astronuc said:
Don't bet on an extinct volcano remaining extinct.

NZ at least has some of the world's most competent vulcanologists. The place is covered in instruments. It is quite certain that the nearest magma bubble is under Lake Taupo. Other places are going to blow first.
 
  • #121
The frequency and magnitude of earthquakes are way down, but they nevertheless persist.

7,500 earthquakes shake resolve in NZealand city
http://news.yahoo.com/7-500-earthquakes-shake-resolve-nzealand-city-161243790.html

Seismic activity has picked up from the North Island, NZ, to Kermadec Islands to Tonga to Papua New Guinea.

And the swarm continues off Fukushima.

Something has definitely changed along the western side of the Pacific plate.
 
  • #122
It is certainly not over for Christchurch.

Just today - http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/newshome/12446921/two-buildings-collapse-as-quakes-hit-chch/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #123
A 5.8 then a 6. On a known fault that is out in the bay - but likely runs right through the central city. Quite bad news if it unzips anymore.
 
  • #124
ugh, there is no end to this
 
  • #125
This is a great graphic mapping the unzipping of a maze of small faults over the past 15 months. Four major events moving from one side of Christchurch to the other.

http://www.canterburyquakelive.co.nz/QuakeMap/Swarms/

About 5% of the city's housing stock, and 60% of its central city, is having to be pulled down and rebuilt or relocated.

Luckily the place is about the best insured against earthquake damage of anywhere and the rural economy is going great guns.

Christchurch has an interesting history because it was a planned "liveable" city, a bit of a utopian dream set up by Victorians reacting against the growing squalor of urban industrialisation.

This means it has always had good bones and a lot of social capital - people were proud and protective of a place they had designed. Here, the local metropolitan authority still owns the port, the airport, the electricity grid, the broadband cabling.

Now it has suffered the worst natural disaster damage of any reasonable sized city (it's only 350,000 pop). But there is also the opportunity to rebuild it green, modern and re-energised.

For instance, all the small scattered IT firms are gathering together to form an IT campus right in the central city. The high tech health sector wants to do the same, as does the foreign student language learning industry.

About 50 years of city evolution is going to be packed into the next 5 years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
815
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
952
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top