MHB An inequality between the integral Remainder of a function and the function.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the integral remainder term \( R_n(b) \) is less than or equal to the function value \( f(b) \) for an infinitely differentiable function \( f(x) \) with non-negative derivatives in a neighborhood around \( x_0 \). The integral form of Taylor's theorem is referenced, showing that \( f(x) \) can be expressed in terms of its derivatives and the remainder \( R_n(x) \). Given that all derivatives at point \( a \) are non-negative, it follows that \( f(b) \) must be greater than or equal to \( R_n(b) \). The conclusion is that the inequality \( R_n(b) \le f(b) \) holds true. This establishes a clear relationship between the function and its integral remainder.
Alone
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a function $f(x)$ which is infinitely differentiable in the neighborhood of $x_0$, and that: $f^{(k)}(x) \ge 0$ for each $k=0,1,2,3,\ldots$ for all $x$ in this neighborhood.

Let $R_n(x)=\frac{1}{n!}\int_a^x f^{(n+1)}(t)(x-t)^n dt$ where $x_0-\epsilon <a<x<b<x_0+\epsilon$;

I want to show that $R_n(b) \le f(b)$, how to show this?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alan,

The integral form of Taylor's theorem yields
$$f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + \cdots + \frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}(x - a)^n + R_n(x)$$
for all $x$ in your neighborhood of $x_0$. If $x$ is in that neighborhood, $\dfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (x - a)^k$ is nonnegative for all $k$. Thus $f(b) \ge R_n(b)$.
 
Yes, easy.

Thanks Euge!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K