An inequality between the integral Remainder of a function and the function.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the inequality \( R_n(b) \le f(b) \) for a function \( f(x) \) that is infinitely differentiable in the neighborhood of \( x_0 \) with nonnegative derivatives. The integral remainder \( R_n(x) \) is defined as \( R_n(x) = \frac{1}{n!}\int_a^x f^{(n+1)}(t)(x-t)^n dt \). By applying the integral form of Taylor's theorem, it is established that since all derivatives \( f^{(k)}(a) \) are nonnegative, the inequality holds true, confirming that \( f(b) \ge R_n(b) \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor's theorem and its integral form
  • Knowledge of infinitely differentiable functions
  • Familiarity with the concept of nonnegative derivatives
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Taylor's theorem in higher dimensions
  • Research properties of infinitely differentiable functions
  • Study the applications of integral remainders in approximation theory
  • Learn about the convergence of Taylor series and their error analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and researchers interested in approximation theory and the properties of differentiable functions.

Alone
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a function $f(x)$ which is infinitely differentiable in the neighborhood of $x_0$, and that: $f^{(k)}(x) \ge 0$ for each $k=0,1,2,3,\ldots$ for all $x$ in this neighborhood.

Let $R_n(x)=\frac{1}{n!}\int_a^x f^{(n+1)}(t)(x-t)^n dt$ where $x_0-\epsilon <a<x<b<x_0+\epsilon$;

I want to show that $R_n(b) \le f(b)$, how to show this?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alan,

The integral form of Taylor's theorem yields
$$f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + \cdots + \frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}(x - a)^n + R_n(x)$$
for all $x$ in your neighborhood of $x_0$. If $x$ is in that neighborhood, $\dfrac{f^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (x - a)^k$ is nonnegative for all $k$. Thus $f(b) \ge R_n(b)$.
 
Yes, easy.

Thanks Euge!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K