An OPAMP with input offset voltage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of an operational amplifier (OPAMP) circuit that includes an input offset voltage. Participants explore the implications of this offset voltage on the output voltage calculations, utilizing concepts such as superposition and nodal analysis. The scope includes homework-related problem-solving and mathematical reasoning regarding circuit behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an approach to calculate output voltage using superposition, considering both input voltage and offset voltage.
  • Another participant suggests that the gain of the circuit may differ from standard formulas due to resistor values, prompting a discussion on the need for nodal analysis.
  • Some participants question whether the standard inverting and non-inverting equations apply, indicating that adjustments may be necessary based on the actual circuit configuration.
  • There is a suggestion to analyze the circuit from scratch rather than relying on derived equations, emphasizing the importance of understanding the influence of each component.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to handle multiple input voltages at the OPAMP terminals and considers using a different reference point for calculations.
  • Another participant warns that changing the ground reference could complicate the analysis, as it would affect all interconnected points in the circuit.
  • Some participants reflect on the limitations of cookie-cutter formulas and the necessity of being able to analyze non-standard circuits effectively.
  • A later reply acknowledges an error in an intuitive formula derived by one participant, reinforcing the value of deriving formulas directly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to analyze the OPAMP circuit. There are competing views on whether to adjust existing gain equations or derive new ones, and uncertainty remains regarding the handling of input voltages and reference points.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the resistor values in the circuit may not match those of standard configurations, which could affect the applicability of derived equations. Additionally, the discussion highlights the interconnectedness of circuit components and the potential complications arising from changing reference points.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying operational amplifiers, circuit analysis, and those seeking to understand the implications of input offset voltage in practical applications.

kl055
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Capture.jpg

Homework Equations


Superposition
Non-inverting OPAMP: V_out = (1 + R/R)V_in = 2*V_in2
Inverting OPAMP: V_out = -V_in
V_os = 2.5mV

The Attempt at a Solution



1. V_in enabled, V_os disabled

V_out1 = -V_in

2. V_os enabled, V_in disabled

To get V_out2, use the non inv. equation where V_in2 is equal to V_1 + V_os
where V_1 is the node between R and R at the middle bottom of the circuit.
V_out2 = 2*(V_1 + V_os)

3. V_out = V_out1 + V_out2

Is this the correct approach?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to take a closer look at the gain of the circuit; The resistor values in the network joining Vout and +Vin may not be identical to those of the prototypical circuit from which your gain formula was derived.

The Vos is usually modeled as a fixed voltage source in series with one of the op-amp inputs, typically the + input. The circuit is not particularly difficult to analyze with a bit of nodal analysis, voltage division, etc.

attachment.php?attachmentid=59030&stc=1&d=1369575714.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    4.5 KB · Views: 804
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
gneill said:
You may want to take a closer look at the gain of the circuit; The resistor values in the network joining Vout and +Vin may not be identical to those of the prototypical circuit from which your gain formula was derived.
Do you mean that neither the inverting nor non-inverting equations will work in this case and that I need to derive new gain equations using nodal analysis?
 
kl055 said:
Do you mean that neither the inverting nor non-inverting equations will work in this case and that I need to derive new gain equations using nodal analysis?

The equations would need adjusting to reflect the actual circuit's values. To adjust the equations, you'll have to know the influence of each resistance on the equation. It would likely be simpler/safer to just analyze the circuit from scratch.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Or do you mean that I need to modify my gain equation in step 2 by finding V_3 (by doing voltage division) and plugging that into the equation?

edit: nvm, I need to read that first
 
I'm pretty sure that step 2 is correct. The professor did an example in class that was similar enough to that case. But in step 1, I have input voltage at both OPAMP terminals so I do not know what to do. I'd rather take the OPAMP as a black box with a characteristic equation if possible.

In case 1, can't I just use V_3 as a reference (ground) and then modify my equation to become
V_out = -(V_in - V_3)?
The prototypical inverting gain equation assumes that V_+ is ground, so if I take my reference at V_3 the above equation should work?
 
The problem is, if you take V3 as the ground reference then all the points that are shown as connected to ground will have to take on some other potential (-V3), and you'll have to adjust Vin accordingly as well (since Vin is a ground-referenced value). Lot's of things are interconnected...

Why don't you try it both ways if you can and compare results?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I'll do that. I was just hoping that there was an intuitive way to do it since I'd rather not derive formulas when writing exams unless I have to :S
 
Last edited:
kl055 said:
I'll do that. I was just hoping that there was an intuitive way to do it since I'd rather not derive formulas when writing exams :S

I think you're likely to run into more "non-standard" circuits than textbook standard ones. Cookie-cutter formulas are limited in applicability. You're much better off being able to quickly analyze a given circuit on-the-fly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
I did the derivation and my "intuitive" formula for part 1 was incorrect (by a factor of 3).
Part 2 was good but I think that I will derive formulas directly from now on.
Thanks for the help
 
  • #11
kl055 said:
I did the derivation and my "intuitive" formula for part 1 was incorrect (by a factor of 3).
Part 2 was good but I think that I will derive formulas directly from now on.
Thanks for the help

Glad to help! Good luck in your studies :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K