Analysis 2- upper/lower integral vs integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter perlawin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between lower and upper integrals of bounded functions, specifically addressing the inequalities involving integrals. It establishes that for all bounded functions, the inequality (L) ∫_a^b f(x)dx ≤ ∫_a^b f(x)dx ≤ (U) ∫_a^b f(x)dx holds true. The participants discuss proving this through induction, focusing on the definitions of lower and upper integrals as suprema and infima of partitions. Visual aids are utilized to illustrate the concepts, emphasizing the gradual increase in area without exact matches.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded functions in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concepts of lower and upper integrals
  • Knowledge of partitions in the context of integrals
  • Basic principles of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of lower and upper integrals in detail
  • Learn how to construct and analyze partitions for bounded functions
  • Explore mathematical induction techniques and their applications in calculus
  • Investigate graphical representations of integrals to enhance conceptual understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians interested in integral theory, and educators seeking to explain the concepts of lower and upper integrals effectively.

perlawin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. True or false (show work): For all bounded functions:
(L) ∫_a^b▒f(x)dx≤∫_a^b▒f(x)dx≤(U)∫_a^b▒f(x)dx



2. (L) ∫_a^b▒f(x)dx= sup{L(f,P) s.t P is a partition of [a,b]}
(U)∫_a^b▒f(x)dx= inf{U(f,P) s.t. P is a partition of [a,b]}




3. I am sure that this is true. What I want to do is prove it by induction. Specifically, prove that the first inequality holds and then show that the second one does. I have drawn pictures representing a base case (how the lower integral is less than the regular one), and I have pictures that illustrate how the amount of area increases but is never exact. How do I actually write it out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you are inducting on, as I don't see any natural numbers in the problem. However, those inequalities should follow from the basic definitions that you've already listed in the relevant equations section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K