MHB Analytic Geometry: Confused on How to Solve Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding solving a problem related to analytic geometry and forces. The user is unsure how to incorporate a force of 500 Newtons and whether to find the distance between lines. Respondents emphasize the importance of showing progress in problem-solving to receive effective help. They clarify that if the lines support a block, the distance is zero, and suggest focusing on finding the x, y, and z components of the forces. If the user lacks foundational knowledge, consulting a teacher is recommended for further guidance.
chiami
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am actually very confused on how to solve the problem. Do I just find the distance between the lines? How do I incorporate the 500 Newtons into the problem? Really confused.

View attachment 6001
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 1.23.06 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-09-20 at 1.23.06 PM.png
    15.5 KB · Views: 111
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello chiami and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
greg1313 said:
Hello chiami and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?

i edited what I wrote the first time, and it explains that I can't really explain what I don't know because I don't even know where to start
 
If, in fact, you have absolutely no idea where to start, you need to talk to your teacher. For one thing, you titled this "how to find distance between lines". What lines? If you mean the lines supporting the block, that "distance" is 0 because they all meet at the block! What you need to do is find the three x, y, and z components of the forces. As the weight is not "swaying" from side to side, the x and y components must sum to 0. Since the weight itself is 500 Newtons, the sum of the z-components must be 500 Newtons. That gives you three equations to solve for the three tensions.

Again, if you really do not know how to do any of those things, you need to talk to your teacher who clearly believes you should.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top