Analytical Chemistry Concentration Calc Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of LCMS results for determining the concentration of melamine in a solid food sample. Participants are exploring whether to take the LCMS readings at face value or to perform calculations based on the amount of food sample used in the extraction process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the LCMS reading of 0.2 ppm does not represent the concentration in the solid food sample but rather in the extracted solution, proposing a calculation to convert this to the concentration in the food sample.
  • Another participant asserts that if the detector has been calibrated with standard solutions, the ppm measured reflects the concentration in the extract, not the original sample.
  • A further contribution emphasizes the need for clarity regarding the term "sample" and questions the understanding of the LCMS procedure, noting that the output is based on the amount of melamine injected and the concentration of the solution.
  • One participant acknowledges the calibration curve created with standard solutions and references a similar situation from another source, suggesting a parallel in their approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the LCMS results should be interpreted directly or require further calculation to reflect the concentration in the original food sample. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the definitions of terms used, such as "sample," and the specifics of the LCMS calibration process. The implications of density differences in the solution and the type of ppm measurement (w/v vs. w/w) are also noted but not fully resolved.

TrueStar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
A lab mate and I are discussing how to properly interpret LCMS results and coming to different conclusions.

We are taking a solid food sample and extracting it with 50:50 acetonitrile/water to determine the concentration of melamine in the food sample. Standard solutions were made that range between 0 and 5ppm of melamine.

The question is whether we read the LCMS results at face value. For example, we could take 100mg of food sample and extracted it with 10mL of solution. If the LCMS reads that the sample has 0.2ppm of melamine in the sample, I don't think that represents what was in the solid. I think we would have to calculate it as the mass of melamine in the LCMS sample to be 0.002mg and because we used 100mg of food sample, then that means the food sample actually contains 20ppm of melamine.

So the question is do we read the LCMS results at face value or do a calculation based on the amount of food sample used?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If you have calibrated your detector with the standard solutions, the ppm you have measured is the concentration in the solution, (in your case the extract), not in the sample itself.
 
Yuo will have to be more specific about what you mean by your terms - especially "sample". What output does the LCMS actually give? It doesn't know how you have treated your sample, so it can't give a reading of 0.2 ppm in the [food] sample. What it measures is amount of melamine injected, which depends on solution concentration and injection volume. If you have done a calibration for constant injection volume of solutions of different concentration, you will get a value for the concentration of your solution, so 0.2 ppm in the [solution] sample would imply a mass of melamine in the solution of about 2 µg. (Note, not exactly 2 µg, if it's ppm by weight, as the density of 50:50 AN/water is not 1 g/mL. Are you working with ppm w/v? You seem to be working with ppm w/w as regards the food sample.)
You don't seem to really understand the procedure you're using. Go back and check how the LCMS was calibrated. What does "0.2ppm of melamine in the sample" actually mean?
 
Borek said:
If you have calibrated your detector with the standard solutions, the ppm you have measured is the concentration in the solution, (in your case the extract), not in the sample itself.

Yes, we created a curve with our standard solutions. I looked around a bit more and it sounds very similar to a situation like this -- http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=49489.0

I think we should be doing the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K