Analyzing Brightness in Series Lightbulb Circuits

AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with a 50W and a 100W lightbulb, the 50W bulb will be brighter due to its higher resistance, which causes it to have a greater voltage drop across it. The calculations presented show conflicting results because they rely on different assumptions about the bulbs' resistances. As the bulbs heat up, the resistance of the tungsten filament changes, complicating predictions about brightness. The correct approach involves using the potential divider equation to determine voltage distribution based on resistance. Ultimately, the 50W bulb receives more voltage and becomes brighter than the 100W bulb in this configuration.
SFphysics101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi
Two lightbulbs in series, one with 50W one with 100W which is brighter. I have two different solutions and can't see my error. Using PR=V^2 and I^2=P/V 50/√50R1=100/√100R2 with the same current and R2=2R1. Using PR=V^2 and the same voltage across both bulbs yields 50R1=100R2 or R1=2R2. Which is the appropriate solution when the bulbs are in series? Why are they different?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome. This looks like homework and should probably be posted elsewhere.
But it could be a more practical question and so:
With any circuit question you cannot assume anything that you haven't already been given or that you haven't yet calculated. The order of doing things has to be right.
Two resistors in series will 'share' the volts in the ratio R1/(R1+R2) : R2/(R1+R2). Potential Divider Equation - look it up.You can see that the 50W bulb has higher volts across it so it will be brighter. By how much, is a harder question. They will definitely not have the same volts across them (that daft result is arrived at by making invalid assumptions!).
You need to remember that tungsten filaments change their resistance by a factor of around 1:10 as they heat up. That makes it very hard to predict reliably what will happen.
If you assume that their resistances don't change (i.e that they don't actually glow), you can work out their resistances from the operating voltage and specified powers.
For real filaments, the 100W bulb will start off with 1/3 of the volts across it but, as they both heat up, the 50W bulb, with 2/3 volts will get hotter and its resistance will go proportionally higher than the 100W (lower resistance) bulb so it will hog more than its fair share of the volts. The 50V bulb will be a bit dimmer than normal but brighter than it would with 2/3 of the supply volts.
 
When I said same voltage I meant a nominal voltage applied to each bulb individually to find the resistance. Other solutions use 120V as this nominal voltage and R=V^2/P. This finds the resistance at the voltage and power ratings of the bulb. Using this method gives a higher resistance for the 50W bulb. I cannot actually see through a voltage divider that the 50W bulb has higher resistance, but the resistance should not change with the voltage. I do know the voltage across each bulb will differ and the current will be the same through both bulbs, hence my second solution above which does not confirm the first. BTW I am out of school, or I'd ask a professor.
 
Last edited:
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Thread will remain closed. OP has been reminded of the PF schoolwork rules, and will repost in the Homework Help forums.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top