Analyzing Current in RC Circuits: A Scientific Approach

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing current in an RC circuit with two capacitors and several resistors. The original poster seeks to understand the behavior of current through specific components immediately after a switch is closed and after a long duration. The problem involves concepts from circuit analysis, including Kirchhoff's rules and the behavior of capacitors in circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the initial conditions of the circuit, questioning the behavior of capacitors immediately after the switch is closed and their impact on current flow. There is discussion about the application of Kirchhoff's rules and the implications of potential differences across components.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and corrections regarding the behavior of capacitors and current flow. Some guidance has been provided on the concept of conventional current versus electron flow, and there is a recognition of the initial conditions affecting current distribution in the circuit.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the assumptions about the capacitors' behavior immediately after the switch is closed, as well as the implications of potential differences in the circuit. Participants are navigating these complexities without arriving at a definitive conclusion.

timnswede
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the circuit below the switch is initially open and both capacitors initially uncharged. All resistors have the same value R.
a.) Find the current through R2 just after the switch is closed.
b.) Find the current through R2 a long time after the switch has been closed.
c.) Describe qualitatively how you expect the current in R3 to behave after switch is closed.
Ubm7yP6.png
0

Homework Equations


V=IR
Kirchhoff's Rules

The Attempt at a Solution


I have only attempted part a so far because I don't think I even did that part right. Well right after the switch is closed the capacitors are an open circuit right? So the current only goes through R1 and R2, so I if current goes up from the positive terminal of the battery and my loop is clockwise I got V-2R=0, so R=V/2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timnswede said:
I have only attempted part a so far because I don't think I even did that part right. Well right after the switch is closed the capacitors are an open circuit right?
Oops. Quite the reverse. The capacitors look like short circuits. The charge on a capacitor cannot change instantaneously so immediately after the switch is closed they will still have 0 V as a potential difference.
 
OK, since there is no potential difference on either of the capacitors that would mean that there is no potential difference across R2 either then since it is in parallel with C1? And I just realized I did Kirchhoff's rules wrong, but then for part b) it would be V-2RI=0, so I=V/2R, since there is no current through the capacitors a long time after the switch has been closed.
 
Yes, that looks good.
 
gneill said:
Yes, that looks good.
Actually after thinking about it a bit more, I think I confused myself more. Since there is no potential difference on the capacitor then electrons won't go there, but the battery still has a potential difference, so wouldn't the electrons still flow through R2, R1, the switch and then to the positive plate of the battery?
Also for part c, electrons won't go to R3 right when the switch is closed, or after a very long time, but they will go to R3 when the capacitors are charging right?
 
timnswede said:
Actually after thinking about it a bit more, I think I confused myself more. Since there is no potential difference on the capacitor then electrons won't go there, but the battery still has a potential difference, so wouldn't the electrons still flow through R2, R1, the switch and then to the positive plate of the battery?
You should get used to working with conventional current (positive charge carriers) rather than electron flow. All the literature you will use will assume conventional current and you don't need the added "translation" headache when things get complicated.

Current will definitely flow to the capacitors. Immediately after the switch closes they behave just like wires (no resistance). They will begin to charge up and a potential difference will develop over time. C1 being in parallel with R2 will initially grab all the current.
Also for part c, electrons won't go to R3 right when the switch is closed, or after a very long time, but they will go to R3 when the capacitors are charging right?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timnswede
gneill said:
You should get used to working with conventional current (positive charge carriers) rather than electron flow. All the literature you will use will assume conventional current and you don't need the added "translation" headache when things get complicated.

Current will definitely flow to the capacitors. Immediately after the switch closes they behave just like wires (no resistance). They will begin to charge up and a potential difference will develop over time. C1 being in parallel with R2 will initially grab all the current.

Right.
Ohh OK, thank you for the explanation. It makes sense to me now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K