Android Studio activities question

  • Thread starter Thread starter kolleamm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Android
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
kolleamm
Messages
476
Reaction score
44
I noticed that when making apps there's activities which are the different classes and then there's the layout pages which are the different pages you see when using the app.

My question is, is the standard to create one class/activity that handles most of layout pages, or a class/activity for each layout page?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kolleamm said:
I noticed that when making apps there's activities which are the different classes and then there's the layout pages which are the different pages you see when using the app.

My question is, is the standard to create one class/activity that handles most of layout pages, or a class/activity for each layout page?
I'm not an Android programmer, so caveat emptor...

It's a common practice in programming in general to separate the code that presents the user interface (layout pages in your case) from the code that performs the actions. That way, the user interface can be customized for a variety of devices with different UIs without having to make changes to whatever actions need to be carried out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
Mark44 said:
I'm not an Android programmer, so caveat emptor...

It's a common practice in programming in general to separate the code that presents the user interface (layout pages in your case) from the code that performs the actions. That way, the user interface can be customized for a variety of devices with different UIs without having to make changes to whatever actions need to be carried out.
Hi you may have misunderstood what I mean. I wasn't referring to the code that generates the layout page. I was referring to whether each layout page should have its own class, or if there should be a single class that controls all the pages, function wise.
 
kolleamm said:
Hi you may have misunderstood what I mean. I wasn't referring to the code that generates the layout page. I was referring to whether each layout page should have its own class, or if there should be a single class that controls all the pages, function wise.
A reasonable partition of things would be a top-level class that contains all of the properties and methods that are common to all pages, together with more specialized classes that would inherit from the top-level class. The specialized classes would take care of the differences between one page and another.

If two pages are identical, though, I don't see any reason for each page having its own class.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog and kolleamm
Mark44 said:
A reasonable partition of things would be a top-level class that contains all of the properties and methods that are common to all pages, together with more specialized classes that would inherit from the top-level class. The specialized classes would take care of the differences between one page and another.

If two pages are identical, though, I don't see any reason for each page having its own class.
Makes sense, I agree with the two page thing. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog