Angular momentum free particle problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the angular momentum of a free particle in an inertial frame, specifically addressing the problem of demonstrating that the particle's angular momentum about the origin O remains constant. The key equations involved are the angular momentum equation, \vec{l}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}, and the time derivative of angular momentum, \frac{d\vec{l}}{dt}=∑\vec{\tau}. It is established that since the particle is free and subject to no external forces, its angular momentum is conserved, leading to the conclusion that \frac{d\vec{l}}{dt}=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with the cross product in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic concepts of inertial frames in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of conservation laws in mechanics
  • Learn about the role of external forces in angular momentum
  • Explore the concept of inertial frames in greater detail
  • Investigate the application of angular momentum in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of angular momentum and its conservation in free particle motion.

rtsswmdktbmhw
Messages
38
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


'Consider an inertial frame in which a free particle travels past the origin O but does not go through it. Show by direct calculation that the particle's angular momentum about O is constant.'


Homework Equations


[itex]\frac{d\vec{l}}{dt}=∑\vec{\tau}[/itex]
[itex]\vec{l}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried working backwards; if angular momentum is a constant then [itex]\frac{d\vec{l}}{dt}=0[/itex] so that the integral gives a constant. That would mean the angular momentum is conserved, but the question doesn't specify that the system is isolated or that there is only central forces acting which are the conditions for conservation.

Am I missing something obvious? I don't think this was meant to be a particularly challenging question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rtsswmdktbmhw said:

Homework Statement


'Consider an inertial frame in which a free particle...
...
the question doesn't specify that the system is isolated or that there is only central forces acting which are the conditions for conservation.

The 'free' in 'free particle' means that the particle is subject to no outside influences, so in particular no external forces and completely isolated.

I would suggest writing expressions for the angular momentum at two arbritary positions using the cross product definition and analyse the difference.
 
CAF123 said:
...


The 'free' in 'free particle' means that the particle is subject to no outside influences, so in particular no external forces and completely isolated.

Oh... derp. I feel silly for not knowing that. That makes the question so trivial now.

Thanks for pointing that out to me :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K