Angular Momentum Homework: Visualizing Lr, Lθ & Lφ

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point particle moves in space under the influence of a force derivable from a
generalized potential of the form

U(r,r&) = V(r) + σ ⋅L

where r is the radius vector from a fixed point, L is the angular momentum about
that point and σ is a fixed vector in space.
Deduce the generalized force Q = (Qr, Qθ, Qφ ) in spherical polar coordinates.
Hence derive Lagrange’s equations of motion.

--------------------------

I actually have the solution to this question, but I do not really understand part of the solution. This is the part that I do not understand from the solution:

-------------------

Let the polar axis of the polar spherical coordinates (r, θ, ϕ) be in the direction
of σ. Note that [tex]L =(0, - mrv_\phi,mrv_\theta)[/tex], where m is the mass of the particle.

[tex]U(r, v) = V (r) + \sigma \cdot \vec{L}[/tex]
[tex]= V (r) + \sigma ( L_r \cos \theta - L_\theta \sin \theta )[/tex]
[tex]= V (r) + \sigma mv_\phi r \sin \theta[/tex]

-------------------

Firstly, [tex]L_r[/tex] is zero? I have difficulty visualizing [tex]L_r[/tex].
Why is there a negative in front of [tex]mrv_\phi[/tex]?
Which is the polar axis for spherical coordinates?
It would be good if someone could provide a link or explain how to visualize [tex]L_r , L_\theta[/tex] and [tex]L_\phi[/tex].

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) [itex]L_r[/itex] is not zero, but the [itex]\theta[/itex] component of [itex]\sigma[/itex] is zero, that's why that term disappears.

(2) Through geometry and trigonometry you should be able to see that [itex]L_\theta[/itex] is negative.

(3) I've always defined [itex]\phi[/itex] to be the polar angle (the one that sweeps the x-y plane), but mathematicians do it oppositely and call [itex]\theta[/itex] to be this angle. It seems this problem follows what I use (that is, [itex]\phi[/itex] is your polar angle).

(4) http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node216.html" is pretty good at giving the geometry of angular momentum in spherical coordinates (from Cartesian coordinates). In the figure they give, magenta is [itex]L_\theta[/itex], blue is [itex]L_r[/itex] and green is [itex]L_\phi[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jdwood983 said:
(1) [itex]L_r[/itex] is not zero, but the [itex]\theta[/itex] component of [itex]\sigma[/itex] is zero, that's why that term disappears.

Really?...Remember, [itex]L_r\equiv \textbf{L}\cdot\mathbf{\hat{r}}=(\textbf{r}\times\textbf{p})\cdot\mathbf{\hat{r}}[/itex], and by definition of the cross product, [itex]\textbf{r}\times\textbf{p}[/itex] must be perpendicular to [itex]\textbf{r}[/itex].
(3) I've always defined [itex]\phi[/itex] to be the polar angle (the one that sweeps the x-y plane), but mathematicians do it oppositely and call [itex]\theta[/itex] to be this angle. It seems this problem follows what I use (that is, [itex]\phi[/itex] is your polar angle).

I disagree. To me, it looks like [itex]\theta[/itex] is the polar angle here.

@Oerg... To more directly answer you question, the polar axis is usually taken to be the z-axis. So, "choosing [itex]\mathbf{\sigma}[/itex] to be directed along the polar axis" is the same as choosing your coordinate system so that the z-axis is aligned with [itex]\mathbf{\sigma}[/itex]
 
I don't really understand.

So [tex]\sigma[/tex] is also in spherical coordinates, then it must have a [tex]\sigma_r[/tex] component?

Also, the r coordinate in spherical coordinates is scalar and represents the magnitude? If it is then [tex]L_r[/tex] should be non-zero if the angular momentum is non zero and the dot product with [tex]\sigma[/tex] should also produce a non-zero r coordinate component?
 
Ahh, I think I might have got it.

If I do the product in cartesian coordinates, then sigma is aligned to the z component of the angular momentum and the z component of the angular momentum is the angular momentum associated with the rotation in the x-y plane which has an angle of [tex]\phi[/tex]. The answer that I get will be the same as the solution,

but my questions still remain. Also, is the dot product for spherical coordinates different from the dot product in cartesian coordinates?