Angular momentum in cartesian coordinates (Lagrangian)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the angular momentum of a particle in cylindrical coordinates (r, φ, z) using Cartesian components. The user initially struggles with the notation, particularly the use of r instead of ρ, and sets z to zero for simplification. After deriving expressions for the components of momentum and angular momentum, they confirm that the angular momentum vector points in the z-direction, yielding the familiar expression Lz = mr²φ̇. Concerns arise about the implications of setting z to zero, as it could affect the direction of the angular momentum vector in three-dimensional space. The user later finds that r is often interpreted as ρ, leading to a more complex expression for the magnitude of angular momentum that does not conform to the expected form of Iω.
JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I would like to discuss with you a problem that I am wondering if I understand it correctly:

Find expressions for the cartesian components and for the magnitude of the angular momentum of a particle in cylindrical coordinates ##(r,\varphi,z)##.

Homework Equations



##p_i = mx_i##, ##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The ##r## confuses me a lot, since we normally use ##\rho## in cylindrical coordinates. I've set up ##\vec{r}## laying in the ##x,y##-plane (i.e. ##z=0##) and ##z## as the rotation axis, but am I allowed to do that? If so, the rest seemed pretty simple:

##x = r \cos \varphi##
##y = r \sin \varphi##
##z = 0##

##\dot{x} = \dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi##
##\dot{y} = \dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi##
##\dot{z} = 0##

##p_x = m\dot{x} = m(\dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi)##
##p_y = m\dot{y} = m(\dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi)##
##p_z = m\dot{z} = 0##

##\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}##

##L_x = y p_z - z p_y = 0##
##L_y = z p_x - x p_z = 0##
##L_z = x p_y - y p_x = mx (\dot{r} \sin \varphi + r \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi) - my(\dot{r} \cos \varphi - r \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi)##

As expected from my initial conditions, the angular momentum vector points in the z-direction, and after simplification I get the well-known expression:

##L_z = mr^2\dot{\varphi}##

But I find it strange to set up the ##z## component to ##0##, and if it was not the case the angular momentum vector could be pointing basically any direction depending on what angle ##\theta## it is leaning (in spherical coordinates). I've tried to solve the problem that way, but I can't get my hands on a proper expression for ##x##,##y## and ##z## that does not involve ##\theta## or a very unpractical arctan or I don't know what. Any suggestion?Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I just found in other pages that apparently for many people the ##r## refers to the ##\rho## I was mentioning. Then my ##x_i## and ##\dot{x}_i## stay the same as before (except with ##\rho## instead of ##r##), and I get those expression for ##\vec{L}##:

##L_x = m[\dot{z}y - z(\dot{\rho} \sin \varphi + \rho \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi)]##
##L_y = m[z(\dot{\rho} \cos \varphi - \rho \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi) - \dot{z}x]##
##L_z = mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##

And the magnitude is very long:

##|\vec{L}| = m \sqrt{\dot{z}^2\rho^2 - 2 z\dot{z} \bigg[x\big(\dot{\rho} \cos \varphi - \rho \dot{\varphi} \sin \varphi\big) + y\big(\dot{\rho} \sin \varphi + \rho \dot{\varphi} \cos \varphi\big) \bigg] + z^2 (\dot{\rho}^2 + \rho^2 \dot{\varphi}^2) + \rho^4 \dot{\varphi}^2}##

Could that be? I really thought it was going to be something of the form ##I \omega##, maybe I cannot see it because of the cylindrical coordinates.

EDIT: I just saw I posted in "Advanced Physics" by mistake. I hope it's not too bad, sorry for that.Julien.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K