Angular momentum operators on matrix form

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the representation of angular momentum operators \( L_{+} \) and \( L_{-} \) in a three-dimensional subspace \( H \) spanned by the states \( |1,-1\rangle \), \( |1,0\rangle \), and \( |1,1\rangle \). The operator \( L_{+} \) is expressed as \( L_{+} = \sqrt{2}\hbar \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \), indicating that it transitions states between different \( m \) values. The matrix is not diagonal because it reflects the action of raising the \( m \) quantum number, with specific entries corresponding to the transitions between states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the notation \( |l,m\rangle \) and its implications
  • Knowledge of matrix representations of operators
  • Basic grasp of linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum operator matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of the \( L_{+} \) and \( L_{-} \) operators
  • Explore the implications of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients in angular momentum coupling
  • Investigate the role of the \( \hbar \) constant in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying angular momentum, quantum state transitions, and operator theory.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi.

I'm given a 3-dimensional subspace [itex]H[/itex] that is made up of the states [itex]|1,-1\rangle[/itex], [itex]|1,0\rangle[/itex] and [itex]|1,1\rangle[/itex] with the states defined as [itex]|l,m\rangle[/itex] and [itex]l=1[/itex] as you can see.

The usual operator relations for [itex]L_{z}[/itex] and [itex]L^{2}[/itex] applies, and also:
[tex]L_{+} = L_{x}+iL_{y}[/tex]
[tex]L_{-} = L_{x}-iL_{y}[/tex]

Then I'm told to express the operators [itex]L_{+}[/itex] and [itex]L_{-}[/itex] in [itex]H[/itex].

The answer for [itex]L_{+}[/itex] is supposed to be:
[tex]{{L}_{+}}=\sqrt{2}\hbar \left[ \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right][/tex]
And the transposed for [itex]L_{-}[/itex]

But I'm really not sure how that is found.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The [itex]\sqrt{2}\hbar[/itex] probably comes from the fact that:
[tex]{{L}_{\pm }}\left| l,m \right\rangle =\sqrt{l\left( l+1 \right)-m\left( m\pm 1 \right)}\hbar \left| l,m \right\rangle[/tex]

But I can't figure out why the entries in the matrix is like that.
My first thought was that it should be diagonal, as it was made up of the 3 bases, but as you can see, it is not diagonal.So I was hoping someone could explain what I'm missing out ?Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denver Dang said:
The [itex]\sqrt{2}\hbar[/itex] probably comes from the fact that:
[tex]{{L}_{\pm }}\left| l,m \right\rangle =\sqrt{l\left( l+1 \right)-m\left( m\pm 1 \right)}\hbar \left| l,m \right\rangle[/tex]

I don't think that is right; it should change the value of m, and also m may not be greater than [itex]\ell[/itex].

Denver Dang said:
The answer for [itex]L_{+}[/itex] is supposed to be:
[tex]{{L}_{+}}=\sqrt{2}\hbar \left[ \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right][/tex]

This acts on column vector that has the first row for m = -1, the second row for m =0, and the third row for m= 1.

The first row of the matrix is all zero because no matter what, when [itex]L_{+}[/itex] acts on a state, there is never anything remaining in the m = -1 position. The second row takes whatever was in the m = -1 position and moves it to the m=0 position (multiplied by a constant). The third row of the the matrix takes whatever is in the m=0 and moves it to m =1 position, multiplied by a constant.

This was a conceptual question and not a homework exercise, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K