Angular momentum or work-energy balance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the angular velocity, ω₂, of an apparatus using both work-energy balance and conservation of angular momentum principles. The initial approach utilized the work-energy balance equation, incorporating gravitational potential energy, but was later simplified to exclude potential energy. The alternative method employed conservation of angular momentum, leading to the conclusion that I₁ω₁ = I₂ω₂ is the correct approach due to the absence of external torques. The analysis reveals that the final kinetic energy (KE₂) about the vertical axis is less than the initial kinetic energy (KE₁), indicating energy transfer to the rods' rotation about their pins.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation principles
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Knowledge of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations related to energy and momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of angular momentum in closed systems
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in rotational motion
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for various shapes and configurations
  • Investigate the effects of external torques on angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying rotational dynamics and energy conservation in mechanical systems will benefit from this discussion.

cambo86
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

The apparatus above has an initial angular velocity of [itex]\omega_{1}[/itex] as the rods are released. I need to find the angular velocity [itex]\omega_{2}[/itex] of the apparatus at the bottom.

I've tried 3 methods.
First I tried a work-energy balance where I included a gravitational potential energy.
[itex]KE_{1} + PE = KE_{2}[/itex]
[itex]0.5 I_{1}\omega_{1}^{2} + mgh = 0.5 I_{2}\omega_{2}^{2}[/itex]

Then I figured that the potential energy is going to only contribute to an increase in velocity of the arms falling down so I dropped the PE term and got,
[itex]0.5 I_{1}\omega_{1}^{2} = 0.5 I_{2}\omega_{2}^{2}[/itex]

I'm just wondering which is correct?

Then I spoke to another student in the class and he said he used conservation of angular momentum. So, he got,
[itex]I_{1}\omega_{1} = I_{2}\omega_{2}[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The angular momentum I have to solve for is indicated by N in the picture.
 
Hello.

There are no external torques acting on the apparatus. So, total angular momentum about the vertical rotation axis will be conserved. So, ##I_1\omega_1 = I_2\omega_2## will get the answer.

Energy conservation is interesting here. If you assume no dissipation of mechanical energy due to friction in the horizontal pins through the ends of the rods, then total mechanical energy will be conserved. When the rods reach the horizontal position, they will be rotating about the pins as well as rotating about the vertical axis. So, you would have to write the equation of conservation of energy as $$KE_1 + PE = KE_2 + KE'$$ where ##KE_1## and ##KE_2## are the initial and final KE's associated with rotation about the vertical axis and ##KE'## is the kinetic energy associated with the rotation of the rods about the pins in the ends of the rods at the instant the rods are horizontal. Both ##KE_2## and ##KE'## are unknowns, so the energy equation alone does not allow you to get the answer.

Although you might expect ##KE'## to equal ##PE##, it turns out that ##KE'## is greater than ##PE##. So, when the arms reach the horizontal position, they have more KE of rotation about the horizontal pins than the amount of initial PE. Thus, it must be that some of the initial ##KE_1## about the vertical axis is transferred to ##KE'##. This in turn means that ##KE_2 < KE_1##; i.e., the final KE about the vertical axis is less than the initial KE about the vertical axis.

You can verify this by first using conservation of angular momentum to get ##\omega_2## and then calculating ##KE_2## to see that ##KE_2 < KE_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K