Angular momentum question (from kleppner's book).

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Kleppner's book regarding the conservation of angular momentum in a system of two drums with a layer of sand. The initial angular velocity of the smaller drum and the conditions for the sand's mass transfer to the larger drum are established. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct moments of inertia for the drums, which are modeled as uniform thin hoops. The key equations involve the conservation of angular momentum and linear momentum, leading to a specific relationship between the angular velocities of both drums. The confusion arises around the final answer, particularly when specific values for mass and radius are substituted, indicating a potential oversight in the calculations.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
question number 6.2 in page 279:
A drum of mass M_A and radius a rotates freely with initial angular velocity w_A(0). A second drum with mass M_B and radius b>a is mounted on the same axis and is at rest, although it is free to rotate.
A thin layer of sand with mass M_s is distributed on the inner surface of the amaller drum. At t=0, small perforations in the inner drum are opened. The sand starts to fly out at a constant rate \lambda and sticks to the outer drum. find the subsequent angular velocities of the two drums w_A and w_B. ignore the transit time of the sand.

ok obviously, we have conserved angular momentum and conserved linear momentum (no external force).
i.e I_Aw_A+I_Bw_B=I_Aw_A(0)
and (M_A+M_s)v0=(M_A-\lambdat)(w_A)a+(M_B+\lambdat)(w_B)b
where v0=w_A(0)*a
but i don't get it from the final answer which is the answer clue:
if lambda*t=M_b and b=2a then w_B=w_A(0)/8.

am i missing something here?
btw, the moments of inertia here are of a uniform think hoop, right?
which MR^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no one can help me on this?
 
I get that answer only if M_A=0. I must be missing something, or I would have at least tried.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K