Angular velocity of circular orbit, small oscillations

Dazed&Confused
Messages
190
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The potential energy of a particle of mass [itex]m[/itex] is [itex]V(r) = k/r + c/3r^3[/itex] where [itex]k<0[/itex] and [itex]c[/itex] is a small constant. Find the angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex] in a circular orbit of radius [itex]a[/itex] and the angular frequency [itex]\omega'[/itex] of small radial oscillations about this circular orbit. Hence show that a nearly circular orbit is approximately an ellipse whose axes precess at an angular frequency [itex]\Omega \approx (c/|k|a^2)\omega^2[/itex]

Homework Equations


[tex]m\ddot{r} -mr\dot{\theta}^2 = -\frac{dV}{dr}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


So the first part is just setting [itex]\ddot{r}[/itex] to zero so that
[tex]-\omega^2 = \left. -\frac{1}{ma}\frac{dV}{dr} \right|_a = \frac{k}{ma^3} + \frac{c}{ma^5}[/tex]
which is the answer given. For the second part I Taylor expanded [tex] \omega^2r -\frac{dV}{dr}[/tex]
about [itex]a[/itex] took the second term to be minus the angular frequency squared. Thus I get
[tex]\omega'^2 = -\omega^2 + \left. \frac{d^2V}{d^2r}\right|_a[/tex]

however with this I get a result different from the answer. I'm not sure where the mistake lies.
 
on Phys.org
The acceleration is minus omega prime squared, not omega prime squared. Is that your problem? Note that if V is 1/r, omega prime must = omega, that's a true ellipse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dazed&Confused
Sorry I think I wasn't clear. I know the acceleration is [itex]-\omega'^2[/itex] so in the answer for [itex]\omega'^2[/itex] I swapped the sign. Is this what you mean?
 
If the sign error is not the mistake, then everything else looks right. Note that the answer given is the difference between omega and omega prime, as that will be the precession frequency.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dazed&Confused
Ok. The answer given in the book is
[tex] \omega'^2 = -\frac{k}{ma^3} +\frac{c}{ma^5}[/tex]
 
Ok, then what you should get is that the difference between omega and omega prime is the second derivative of V at r=a divided by 2*omega, and I presume that comes out what is given in the question.
 
Well I'm not sure how they get [itex]\omega'[/itex]. Do you have any ideas?
 
Your analysis should be correct, are you taking your answer to lowest order in c?
 
Well I'm expanding in terms of [itex]r[/itex] so that it's always first order in [itex]c[/itex].
 
  • #10
I get [tex] \omega'^2 = \frac{3k}{ma^3} + \frac{5c}{ma^5}[/tex]
 
  • #11
Perhaps the problem is in the effective potential you are using. You are effectively in a rotating reference frame with a centrifugal potential that is proportional to r. But that means when you perturb r, the particle is given extra angular momentum so it continues to corotate with the rotating frame. What should actually happen is the particle should maintain its angular momentum. So the effective potential actually looks like L2/r, not proportional to r like a centrifugal potential. Look up the equation for r motion that conserves L, and use that as the effective potential instead, maybe there's a lowest order correction induced in effect by the L-conserving coriolis force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dazed&Confused
  • #12
Yes thank you that did the trick. I will attempt the final part now.
 
  • #13
I figured I may as well post what I did:
[tex]\omega'^2 - \omega^2 = (\omega'-\omega)(\omega+\omega') \approx (\omega'-\omega)(2\omega)[/tex]
so that
[tex] \omega'-\omega \approx \frac{\omega'^2 - \omega^2}{2\omega} \approx \frac{c\omega^2}{|k|a^2\omega}<br /> = \frac{c}{|k|a^2}\omega[/tex]
as terms with [itex]c^2[/itex] are negligible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
19K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K