- #1
phildoe
- 18
- 0
I was reading this article
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm
I don't understand how this doesn't defie relativity. It sais something about you can see the light exit the caesium before it even enters, thus having went faster then the speed of light but the article sais it doesn't defie relativity because you can't use it to transfer infromation faster then the speed of light. So how do we know it went faster then the speed of light if no infromation is transferred before the light gets to us. I think I am way off on this one...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/841690.stm
I don't understand how this doesn't defie relativity. It sais something about you can see the light exit the caesium before it even enters, thus having went faster then the speed of light but the article sais it doesn't defie relativity because you can't use it to transfer infromation faster then the speed of light. So how do we know it went faster then the speed of light if no infromation is transferred before the light gets to us. I think I am way off on this one...