Another circuit diagram simplifying question (harder)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating net resistance in a circuit where the battery is positioned between two paths. Participants emphasize the use of Kirchhoff's laws for analyzing the circuit, specifically the conservation of charge and energy, alongside Ohm's law. A participant initially miscalculates the net resistance as 43.3333 ohms instead of the correct value of 50 ohms. The conversation highlights the importance of simplifying resistors in series and parallel configurations to arrive at the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's laws, including conservation of charge and energy.
  • Proficiency in Ohm's law for calculating voltage, current, and resistance.
  • Knowledge of series and parallel resistor configurations.
  • Familiarity with circuit diagram analysis and simplification techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's laws in complex circuits.
  • Learn how to simplify circuits with series and parallel resistors.
  • Practice problems involving net resistance calculations in various circuit configurations.
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques, such as Thevenin's and Norton's theorems.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, hobbyists working on circuit design, and anyone seeking to improve their skills in circuit analysis and resistance calculations.

F|234K
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
here's the problem

i want to find the net resistance. the only problem i think i have is that i don't know how to change the diagram so that the battery isn't in the middle of the circuit (i only know how to do questions where the battery is connected like a single complete path, which this particular problem sort of has 2 paths).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easy and starightforexard to calculate the substitution resitance for the triangle on the right hand side from the battery right? Once you have done that you will need to apply Kirchhoff's laws expressing the conservation of charge and energy.

The battery can be in the middle, that should not be a problem

regards
marlon
 
i have thought of that : using kirchhoffs rules to find the net resistance. but i have no idea how the rules relates to resistance.
 
F|234K said:
i have thought of that : using kirchhoffs rules to find the net resistance. but i have no idea how the rules relates to resistance.

The conservation of energy requires that the sum of all potentials are zero in each chain. Then use Ohm's law to bring the resistance. it will work like that. Don't forget to apply conservation of charge also...

good luck

marlon
 
i think i did it the way you told me to, but then i got the wrong answer. my answer is 43.3333, but the right answer is 50...
 
can you please show me how to do it?
 
i think the diagram can be simplify into this...but can you please show me what to do next?
 
if you simplify the left side to a 120 ohm resistor, then I am pretty sure you can consider the 120 ohm and the 60 ohm on the right as a series resistor
 
Im probably wrong though. I never was good with kirschoff's rules.
 
  • #10
hm...well can you please tell what you might do FIRST in order to find the net resistance?
 
  • #11
http://www.public.asu.edu/~hyousif/circuitreduction2.JPG

Im sure of all that. What happens after that I don't know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
i got to the point where you got. but then i don't know how to find the net resistance when the battery is in the middle...
 
  • #13
Whosum said:
if you simplify the left side to a 120 ohm resistor, then I am pretty sure you can consider the 120 ohm and the 60 ohm on the right as a series resistor

Whosum is partly right in taking the 3 resistors on the left and noticing there are in series. Once you have that combined, notice that the right side (60ohms) is now in parallel with the left side (because they share a common node at both their ends)..

Once you combine the left side in parallel with the right, the rest should become clear..
 
  • #14
oh...i get it. thanks a lot Ouabache for your last implication. thanks very much everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K