Another conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving conservation of momentum, where a skateboarder throws a newspaper while rolling backward. The skateboarder has a mass of 50 kg and rolls backward at 1.4 m/s after throwing the 5.4 kg newspaper forward at 7.4 m/s. Participants clarify that the initial velocity of the skateboarder and the newspaper should be considered the same before the throw. There is some confusion about the calculations, but one participant suggests cleaning up the equations for better readability. The conversation emphasizes understanding the conservation of momentum principles in this scenario.
ownedbyphysics
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The issue of the New York Times had a mass of 5.4 kg. Suppose a skateboarder picks up a copy of this issue to have a look at the comic pages while rolling backward on the sakteboard. Upon realizing that the New York Times doesn't have a "funnies" section, the skateboarder promptly throws the entire issue in a recycling container. The newspaper is thrown forward with a speed of 7.4m/s. When the skater throws the newspaper away, he rolls backwards at a speed of 1.4m/s. If the combined mass of the skateboarder and the skateboard is 50.0kg, what is the initial velocity of the skateboarder and newspaper?

I don't know if it's asking for the combined Vi of the skateboarder and the newspaper or if it's asking for each. This is what I did though

1. msvs,i + mnvn,i= msvs,f + mnvn,f = 50(vi+vi2)= (44.6)(-1.4)+(5.4)(7.4)
2. 50(vi+vi2) = -22.48
3. -22.48/50= -.4496

I don't know if that's right, but I have no idea how to do it! help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help please! =)
 
is the skateboard frictionless?
 
That looks about right. I am not sure about the math though. I trust you can check that yourself. It is not necessary to separate the initial velocities of the skateboarder and the newspaper like you did, since they are essentially the same thing. Thats what its asking really, don't get confused about it.

It be really nice if you could clean up your equations in a more readable way though...
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top