Why does (-1)^2 equal both 1 and -1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathelord
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the equation (-1)^2 equating to both 1 and -1. It highlights that e^[i*pi] equals -1, while e^[2i*pi] equals 1, leading to a misunderstanding when taking logarithms, which can yield multiple values. The error arises from misapplying the logarithmic function by not considering the integer k in the expression ln(1) = 2kπi. This results in the incorrect conclusion that i equals 0, creating a paradox. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing the multivalued nature of logarithms in complex analysis.
mathelord
HI, since e^[i*pi]=-1,then e^[2i*pi]=1.
taking lin of both sides,2*i*pi=0,that makes i=0
squaring both sides,you get -1 to equal 0.
Is there a problem with what i have done,and what is it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When complex outputs are allowed, logarithms become multivalued. In this case, the correct formulae are :

e^{2k\pi i} = 1, \ln(1) = 2k\pi i where k ranges over the integers.

In your case, you're confusing the result for k = 0 with k = 1, hence the apparent paradox.
 
Last edited:
Yes and:

(-1)^2 = 1 \quad 1^2 = 1 \quad 1 = - 1 \quad 2 = 0

It's the same things really :rolleyes:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top