Another laplace differential equation.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Laplace differential equation, with participants analyzing the Laplace transforms of various functions and their implications in solving the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Laplace transform to both sides of the equation but expresses confusion over the complexity of the resulting expression and the difficulty in finding its inverse. Some participants question the accuracy of the initial Laplace transform applied to the forcing function, suggesting that the original poster may have made an error in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the correct application of the Laplace transform, particularly regarding the treatment of the forcing function. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the Laplace transform, with some guidance being offered on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some uncertainty regarding the correct form of the Laplace transform for the forcing function, as well as the implications of using the unit step function in this context. Participants are also navigating the complexity of the resulting expressions from their calculations.

TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


question is attached

Homework Equations


L(1) = 1 /s
L(t^n) = n!/s^(n+1)
L{f '(t)} = s F(s) - f(0)
L{f ''(t)} = s^2 F(s) - s f(0) - f '(0)

The Attempt at a Solution



okay so i laplace transformed both sides and i got:

(s^2) Y(s) + 5s -5 -5s Y(s) -25 - 6Y(s) = -84exp(-5s) / s
Y(s) [s^2 - 5s - 6] + 5s - 30 = -84exp(-5s) / s
Y(s) = ((-exp(-5s)(5s(s-6)*exp(5s) +84)) / (s^3 - 5s^2 - 6s)

but that's so long and complicated that I am wondering if I've stuffed up because I can't even seem to find the inverse laplace of the function.
 

Attachments

  • 111111111.png
    111111111.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 469
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your first line, I think I found a problem:

(s^2) Y(s) + 5s -5 -5s Y(s) -25 - 6Y(s) = -84exp(-5s) / s

The laplace transform of the forcing function -84H(t-5), assuming H is the unit step function, that laplace transform should be different.

The table I have claims that:
[tex]L{f(t)U(t-a)) = e^{-as}L(F(t+a))[/tex]

Since yout f(t) is basically 1, if you just pull out the constant -84. the laplace of which is 1/s, so the laplace of f(t+a) should be 1/(s+a) I believe.
 
laplace of f(t+a) isn't 1/(s+a) i think.
 
I'm looking at the table right now.

The laplace transform of f(t)U(t-1) is e^(-as) times the laplace transform of f(t+a).

Oh wait, I see what you mean.
 
okay so that would mean laplace of -84 H(t-5) = -84exp(-5s) / (s+5) yea?
 
That's how I interpret it.
 
so my working out now is: (s^2) Y(s) + 5s -5 -5s Y(s) -25 - 6Y(s) = -84exp(-5s) / s+5

therefore Y(s) = -exp(-5s)(5(s-6)(s+5)*exp(5s) +84) / (s-6)(s+1)(s+5)
making y(t) = -1/11exp(-5(t+6))*[3(4exp(11t) - 11exp(4t+35) + 7exp(55) H(t-5)+55 exp(4t+30)] which is way to long to be right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K