Another reu personal statement thread

AI Thread Summary
Assistance is sought for criticism on a statement of purpose for a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) application, which combines elements from multiple previous drafts. The focus is on improving the opening section. Users express willingness to help with proofreading, although some face access issues with Google Docs. Clarification is provided regarding forum rules on bumping threads, emphasizing a 24-hour waiting period before doing so. Ultimately, the Google document link is reported as taken down, limiting further feedback opportunities.
Takuza
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I don't think anyone really likes these threads, but I could use some assistance. Could anyone offer me some criticism on my statement of purpose below, for an REU? This one is really an amalgamation of a couple of ones that I wrote for specifically for different programs, which all more of less asked me to briefly explain why I was interested in research and the fields I was interested in, as well as describing past experiences. In this way instead of posting 6 different ones, I will just absorb what I learn from this one. I am particularly concerned with the opening

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EnqonVHP8Tw1MPGPet3GTwzIRAbToMVYui7qQ20Xox4/edit

any suggestions/criticisms would be appreciated, thanks. Also let me know if you cannot access the doc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gonna go ahead and violate the rules with this one time bump.
 
Takuza said:
Gonna go ahead and violate the rules with this one time bump.

Don't worry, bumping once is not against the rules :-p
 
I would totally be down to proofreading this, but I'm one of the cool kids that only has Hotmail and has no intention of getting a Google Docs account until I absolutely have to. Please feel free to PM the document to me.
 
micromass said:
Don't worry, bumping once is not against the rules :-p

He was probably thinking of the 24-hour rule:

Do not "bump" one of your threads to the top of a forum's thread list by posting a basically empty message to it, until at least 24 hours have passed since the latest post in the thread; and then do it only once per thread.

But I congratulate him on KNOWING the rules
 
I responded to your message.

Anyone who was wondering - the Google doc has been taken down.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Back
Top