Answer Time & Distance: Thief and Policeman Catch Up

  • Thread starter Thread starter aprao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
aprao
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hai Expert
COuld you please explain to me how to solve the following problems?

Question:
A Thief sees a policeman 100 Metre ahead of him. He Immediately turns back and starts running at 6Kmph. The Policeman chases him at a speed of 8Kmph. After What time does the policeman catch up with the thief ?


Regards
aprao
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Version 1:
1) Let your origin coincide with your police-man's initial position
How can we write the police-man's subsequent position (measured relative, that is, to the origin) as a function of time?
2) Measured from the policeman's initial position, the thief's initial position is 100.
How can we write the thief's subsequent position (measured relative, that is, to the origin) as a function of time?

3) Since at the time when the policeman catches up with the thief, their positions is the same, you may find an equation for the time by equating their position functions at that time.

Version 2:
Compute the relative velocity the policeman has to the thief.
How long would it take a person runnning with this relative velocity to travel 100 meters?

I strongly suggest you work out the time by both versions, and verify that both versions predict the same time.
This will help you enhancing your understanding of the maths&physics involved.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top