I Antoine Tilloy theory of gravity

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Theory
kodama
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
144
latest paper

Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber model with massive flashes
Antoine Tilloy
(Submitted on 12 Sep 2017)
We introduce a modification of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) model in which the flashes (or collapse space-time events) source a classical gravitational field. The resulting semi-classical theory of Newtonian gravity preserves the statistical interpretation of quantum states of matter in contrast with mean field approaches. It can be seen as a discrete version of recent proposals of consistent hybrid quantum classical theories. The model seems to be in agreement with known experimental data and introduces new falsifiable predictions: (1) particles do not attract themselves, (2) the 1/r gravitational potential of Newtonian gravity is cut-off at short (≲10−7m) distances, and (3) gravity makes spatial superpositions decohere at a rate inversely proportional to that coming from the vanilla GRW model. Together, the last two predictions make the model experimentally falsifiable for all values of its parameters.
Comments: 10 pages
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:1709.03809 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:1709.03809v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Echoes of Verlinde's Emergent Gravity which was found to be close in general terms, but ultimately contrary to, empirical evidence.

I do not see how you can falsify the prediction that particles do not attract themselves, something that the abstract seems to acknowledge in its last sentence.

The second prediction requires a roughly 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements.
 
  • Like
Likes kodama
ohwilleke said:
Echoes of Verlinde's Emergent Gravity which was found to be close in general terms, but ultimately contrary to, empirical evidence.

I do not see how you can falsify the prediction that particles do not attract themselves, something that the abstract seems to acknowledge in its last sentence.

The second prediction requires a roughly 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements.

I wonder if you can combine Verlinde's Emergent Gravity with Tilloy's.

if experiments are able to bridge the 4 order of magnitude improvement over existing measurements, and find agreement with Tilloy, what would that imply?
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top