Any concerns over recent choices of NRC Chairpeople

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goldenlemur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the qualifications of NRC Chairpeople Greg Jaczko and Allison Macfarlane, with a focus on their technical expertise in nuclear engineering. While Jaczko holds a PhD in physics, concerns are raised about the theoretical nature of his dissertation. Macfarlane, a geologist, has experience with nuclear waste issues but lacks comprehensive knowledge of nuclear power systems. The discussion emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in leadership, advocating for a candidate who combines technical expertise with political acumen, particularly in light of the social challenges facing the nuclear industry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear engineering principles
  • Familiarity with the role of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
  • Knowledge of nuclear waste management practices
  • Awareness of the political landscape surrounding nuclear energy policy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the qualifications and backgrounds of NRC Chair nominees
  • Examine the implications of the Yucca Mountain facility on nuclear waste disposal
  • Investigate the impact of political influences on nuclear regulatory decisions
  • Explore the technical and social challenges currently facing the nuclear industry
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, policymakers, and anyone involved in nuclear energy regulation or waste management will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the intersection of technical expertise and political decision-making in the nuclear sector.

Goldenlemur
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am talking about Greg Jaczko and now Allison Macfarlane.

I do not think they are incapable per say, but I question their technical knowledge. Nuclear reactors are highly engineered systems. Jaczko does have a PhD in physics, but it seems to me his dissertation was quite theoretical. Macfarlane is a geologist who does study nuclear waste issues. However, that is only one aspect of nuclear power.

Perhaps I am being baised being a nuclear engineer myself?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Seen that the principal issues for the nuclear industry currently are social rather than technical, I'd be quite open to a savy politician being nominated to the role rather than a technical expert.
 
etudiant said:
Seen that the principal issues for the nuclear industry currently are social rather than technical, I'd be quite open to a savy politician being nominated to the role rather than a technical expert.
I'd prefer someone who a technical expert who is a savvy politician, and who does not have an agenda either way. Regulation should be objective and impartial.

Macfarlane's bio brief - http://esp.gmu.edu/people/facultybios/macfarlane.html

I have to wonder what is her agenda regarding spent fuel and/or HLW disposal in a repository.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Atomicinsights.com voices my concerns very well. I have the same objections.

However, the word in Rockville is this a done deal. I hope the rumors are wrong. Any of the other Commissioners would have been a much better choice.
 
Since the appointee has to be confirmed by the senate, I don't think anyone could be confirmed that is pro- or neutral on the subject of Yucca Mountain while Harry Reid is the majority leader. I see a continuation of the 4-1 vote history with the chairperson being the 1.
 
The congressional hearings have convinced me that what I have heard was accurate. They will appoint Dr. Macfarlane. The atomic insights blog seems to agree with me here.

My real curiosity lies in what is contained in the IG report. Rod Adams seems to think it is pretty bad.
 
Jaczko seemed to have a concerted effort to slow the process down; all of his reorganization of paperwork has done is put another layer of cruft in the bureaucratic morass. Not surprising, seeing as he was nominated by an oil man.
Macfarlane will likely be just as obstinate and obtuse, being nominated by a "green energy" messiah.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
19K