Any experimental evidence of Doppler shift in light?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Numerous experiments have confirmed the Doppler shift of light, demonstrating that light from fast-moving objects exhibits higher frequency when approaching and lower frequency when receding. Police radar guns utilize this principle, measuring frequency differences between emitted radar signals and their Doppler-shifted returns. Simple experiments, such as spinning a buzzer, illustrate the acoustic Doppler effect, while optical measurements require more sophisticated equipment. Observations of distant galaxies show redshift effects, confirming the phenomenon in astronomical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Doppler effect principles
  • Familiarity with radar technology and its applications
  • Basic knowledge of wave frequency and wavelength
  • Experience with optical measurement techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of the Doppler effect in light and sound
  • Explore the functionality of police radar guns and their measurement techniques
  • Learn about redshift and its implications in astrophysics
  • Investigate optical measurement methods for detecting frequency shifts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, astronomy enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the practical applications of the Doppler effect in both terrestrial and astronomical contexts.

Crazy Tosser
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Were there any experiments that proved doppler shift of light on a fast moving object - that it has higher frequency if the object is moving towards you and lower if the object is moving away?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Many, many experiments. I even did this in college. It's not hard.
 
Ever been caught by a police radar trap?
 
Excuse me, I always thought police trap was sound waves, not light waves. And how was the experiment performed, Vanadium?
 
Crazy Tosser said:
Excuse me, I always thought police trap was sound waves, not light waves.
Police radar guns use radar (ie radio waves = light) they measure the difference in frequency between the outgoing signal and the doppler shifted return. It's very easy in electronics to accurately measure small frequency differences between two signals - much easier than measuring pulse time of flight for instance.

You can do an easy experiment on acoustical doppler shift by just spinning a buzzer around your head on a wire. Optical / radio needs a bit more equipment but it's still an ugrad lab practical.
 
Ok, so a 30 mph difference in speed produces a measurable difference in frequency of light? >.< You would think that stars that travel at thousands km/sec away from us would not even be seen?
 
Crazy Tosser said:
Ok, so a 30 mph difference in speed produces a measurable difference in frequency of light?
There is a trick to measure slight differences in two frequencies.
Imagine you have a very long sin wave drawn on a chart - now add another very long wave with a tiny difference in frequency and put it next to the first. They will line-up almost perfectly at the start.
But if they differ by 1 part in a million then after a 1/2 million waves the top of one will line up with the bottom of another - this is very easy to detect.
Since the rader gun is sending billions of wavelengths /second it only has to sample a fraction of a second to line up a million waves.

You would think that stars that travel at thousands km/sec away from us would not even be seen?
Speed of light is 300,000km/s so 3000km/s is only a 1% shift. Stars are a continuum source so as 1% of the visible light is moved into the IR another 1% of the UV is moved into the visible. You do see the effect in very distant galaxies - they are red shifted out of the visible into the infrared.
 
Crazy Tosser said:
And how was the experiment performed, Vanadium?

Measuring the spectrum of the limb of the sun that is moving away from us, and comparing it to the limb of the sun that is moving towards us. The sun rotates at a few km per second, so it's about a 10 ppm effect. It's quite straightforward, actually.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K