Have I Covered the Basic Maths Needed for MIT Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kerol9904
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Idea Topics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the readiness of a student studying at Kumon to tackle MIT's introductory physics course, 8.01. The student seeks clarity on the math levels covered in Kumon, particularly from level G onwards, and how they align with the prerequisites for 8.01. It is established that level G is insufficient for 8.01, which requires a solid understanding of mathematics, specifically around level N to start and level O for completion. The course expects students to be proficient in applying mathematical concepts rather than just being able to solve problems. The conversation emphasizes the need for mastery of the material, as MIT's physics students are typically highly capable and motivated, making the course particularly challenging. Tips for mastering the necessary math skills are sought, highlighting the student's eagerness to begin studying physics.
kerol9904
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all. This is my first post, so I hope this is the correct place to post.

I have been studying maths at Kumon for the past years. I just want to see if I have covered the basic maths needed for studying physics (start with MIT 8.01 maybe?). When I browse through this forum, I have no idea if I have studied the subject. So, I would like someone to help me knowing the topics (i.e. Precalc, Calc.1, Calc.2 etc.) of each of the levels. (Not all. Just from level G maybe?)
Here's the link to the general description of the levels covered in Kumon Maths.
http://www.kumon.com/miscellaneous/kumon_math_levels.pdf

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not 100% sure what you are asking, but if you are asking whether G is enough to study 8.01, the answer is no. 8.01 expects pretty much that whole sheet. More importantly, it expects the student to be facile with mathematics at that level: the student needs to be good enough with the material that a mathematical explanation will be enlightening and not more confuising.
 
No. That's not what I mean. I meant that can I get a rough idea of what the levels are covering?
For example, level XX is covering Precalculus or level YY is covering Calculus. I would like to know the level's standard in terms of US(?) system.
Another thing I want to ask is that what is the minimum level to start 8.01? Certainly it's not all of the levels, right?

I certainly wasn't expecting G to be enough for 8.01.
 
It doesn't map cleanly onto the US system.

8.01 would require roughly Level N to start and roughly completion of Level O before finishing. 8.01 has 18.01 as a co-requisite, and 18.01 is a fairly fast-paced calculus class. But as I said, the real issue is that it assumes facility with the mathematics. Being able to eventually grind out a problem at Level O is not enough.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
But as I said, the real issue is that it assumes facility with the mathematics. Being able to eventually grind out a problem at Level O is not enough.

So, you mean that I have to fully master the maths so that I can apply it to the physics? If that's what you mean, then any tips that you can provide? I would really like to start with physics early since it's my passion.
 
Keep in mind that this is an MIT course. Students in intro physics at MIT are not like students in intro physics at most other universities. Most or all of them are probably very bright, very well prepared, and very strongly motivated.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top