I Any inflexion-point solutions to Euler-Lagrange equation?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Happiness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler-lagrange
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to determine the shortest distance between two points, highlighting that the straight line is only proven to be an extremum path. There is a debate about whether the book should clarify that the straight line represents a stationary value rather than strictly an extremum value, suggesting the inclusion of inflexion-point paths. Professor Susskind's teachings are noted for focusing on extremum and saddle-point solutions, without addressing inflexion-point solutions. An example provided illustrates that while the shorter segment of a great circle represents a global minimum, the longer segment does not qualify as either a minimum or maximum. The conversation emphasizes the nuances in interpreting solutions derived from the Euler-Lagrange equation.
Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
The following pages use Euler-Lagrange equation to solve for the shortest distance between two points and in the last paragraph mentions: "the straight line has only been proved to be an extremum path".

I believe the solution to the Euler-Lagrange equation gives the total length ##I## a stationary value and not an extremum value, so should the book have said: "the straight line has only been proved to be an extremum path or an inflexion-point path"?

Also, Professor Susskind, I believe, never mentions inflexion-point solutions when he teaches Euler-Lagrange equation, but only extremum and saddle-point solutions.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 12.48.00 am.png

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 12.48.15 am.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the EL equations give stationary solutions. The prime example of this is finding stationary pathlengths on the sphere. The global minimum between two points is the shorter part of the great circle connecting them. The long part lf the same great circle can be shown to be neither a minimum or a maximum.
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top