Any limit on how fast a Maglev can go?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the theoretical limits of speed for Maglev trains, particularly in the context of magnetism, friction, and relativistic effects. Participants explore various factors that could influence acceleration and maximum speed, including air resistance, track design, and the implications of relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether there is a speed limit to Maglev trains when neglecting friction and relativistic effects, suggesting that magnetic forces may impose limitations.
  • Concerns are raised about air resistance being a significant factor in speed limitations, particularly in non-evacuated environments.
  • Participants discuss the potential need for adaptive magnetic forces to compensate for weight distribution and external impacts, such as bird strikes.
  • There is speculation about the effects of high speeds on track design, including the need for banking to prevent derailment during turns.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of achieving relativistic speeds, noting the immense energy requirements and the implications of time dilation and length contraction.
  • One participant mentions that while the mass of the train does not increase, the weight does, necessitating stronger magnets at high speeds.
  • There is a discussion about the visual effects of relativistic speeds, including Terrell Rotation and the perception of length contraction.
  • The geographical context of the Maglev's operation is considered, with implications for speed and forces acting on the train if it were to reach relativistic speeds on Earth.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of friction and air resistance, with some arguing that these factors cannot be neglected while others suggest theoretical scenarios where they might be. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the maximum achievable speed of Maglev trains and the implications of relativistic physics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about neglecting friction and relativistic effects, as well as the dependence on specific definitions of speed limits and operational environments. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of energy requirements for achieving high speeds.

  • #31
Vanadium 50 said:
Ha. Ha. Ha.

You got is good. We thought you were asking a serious, albeit grossly uninformed question, and took it seriously. But apparently you were just funning with us. You got us good.
Not trying to fool anyone. I think it's self-explanatory that a lot of my posts in this thread are hypothetical at best. But they are fun. And technically, theoretically possible. So, let's continue to stick to physics, with a sense of humor at the same time. When I first started this thread, I posed some really good questions, I think. So, it's not all a joke.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #33
Frabjous said:
Do you even recognize that what you are proposing is nonsense?
Fantastical, yes. Nonsense? 🤔 (OK, well, not any more than it started out in the OP.)

Skyhooks are cables that reach down from orbit and can nab or deposit payloads that are moving at a significantly different velocity. They do this by not being rigid or straight, and both ends are independently maneuverable to some extent. Of course, the window for connection is limited by that disparity in velocity.

Since we're already talking about technology levels that can accelerate a payload to relativistic velocities, and can be long enough to each the moon...

Presumably, a similar principle could be applied to the rail-train. Not the skyhook part, but having a cable system that is flexible enough to join endpoints with significant relative motion.

There are a number of places its Earth-end could be situated to facilitate this. The poles are an obvious one, but various orbital locations could work too.
 
Last edited:
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frabjous and jaketodd
  • #34
It seems we are a good point to close this thread having answered and explored the OPs original question,

Thank you all for commenting here.

Thread now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jaketodd

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K