Any mechanical device allowing free lateral shaft movement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a mechanical device intended to launch projectiles, specifically tennis balls, using a spring mechanism. Participants explore various methods to allow lateral movement of a square sheet attached to the spring while minimizing friction and ensuring proper alignment within the device.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using ball bearings for lateral movement, questioning their complexity and seeking simpler alternatives.
  • Another participant argues that good tolerances and a rubber/plastic bush could mitigate misalignment issues without additional components.
  • Concerns are raised about high friction potentially slowing down the movement of the sheet, prompting a search for solutions to reduce friction.
  • A suggestion is made to use linear bearings as a potential solution for reducing friction and improving movement.
  • Another participant proposes using a single shaft inside the spring as an alternative design approach.
  • One participant critiques the four-rod design, stating it may lead to misalignment and poor sliding action, suggesting a spring-powered piston in a cylinder as a more reliable option.
  • Another participant considers making the holes in the sheet larger to accommodate misalignment and proposes using soft/slippery materials to improve movement.
  • Concerns about wear and tear on a piston made from low-friction materials are expressed, alongside the potential for increased thickness to mitigate tilt issues.
  • One participant recommends "Oilite" bushings as a cost-effective solution, emphasizing the importance of alignment and suggesting oil-impregnated bearings for the design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the best approach to achieve the desired movement and minimize friction. No consensus is reached, as multiple competing views and suggestions remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations related to alignment, friction, and the mechanical design of the proposed device. Specific assumptions about material properties and design constraints are not fully resolved.

MHassaan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I am designing a sort of automatic spring gun to use with projectiles the size of normal tennis balls - sort of like a bowling machine.

I have a horizontal spring, attached at one end to a square sheet of metal, and fixed at the other end. The square sheet of metal is supposed to hit the 'bullet' when the spring is freed after having been compressed. As a constraint to allow for movement in only one axis, there are four holes in the square sheet around the spring, and four fixed shafts to go in them so the sheet can only move forward or backwards.

The only problem is, I need something which will connect the square sheet with the shafts in such a way so as to allow lateral movement of the square sheet caused by the spring, with minimum friction. A picture is attached:

attachment.php?attachmentid=48635&stc=1&d=1340714946.jpg


Are ball bearings alright? Is there anything less complex? Preferably I need something that I can mount onto the sheet. I'm a complete beginner when it comes to mechanical components...

Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Diagram.JPG
    Diagram.JPG
    35.1 KB · Views: 1,350
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don't need any component really, just no misalignment (ie good tolerances). A press in rubber/plastic bush would allow for some small misalignement caused by the spring action.
 
The sheet would move really quickly once the spring is pulled back and released. Won't the high friction between it and the rods slow it down (which isn't what I want since it is supposed to be a 'gun')?

I need some way to avoid this friction...
 
Flange-mounted linear bearings! Just the thing! Thanks a lot!
 
You could also use a single shaft inside the spring.
 
MHassaan said:
The sheet would move really quickly once the spring is pulled back and released. Won't the high friction between it and the rods slow it down (which isn't what I want since it is supposed to be a 'gun')?

I need some way to avoid this friction...

A good fit, surface finish and grease. A bush is probably the best option, misalignment is taken by the stiffness of the rubber/plastic. A PTFE bush seems sensible for low friction.
Bearings seem a bit overkill of this.

The problem you are going to have isn't friction per se. It's misalignment (side loads).
The 4 rod design is flawed because it's really hard to control the alignment of the plate relative to 4 long slender rods. When it's drawn back the plate tilts, giving a poor sliding action.

Why not just make it a spring powered piston in a cylinder?
 
I think you're probably right xxChrisxx. But won't a piston in a cylinder experience a similar tilt? Probably much less I'm assuming.

How about making the holes in the sheet a little bigger than required to accommodate for misalignment? Or perhaps even bigger and fix a ring in each hole made of soft/slippery material like acetal, or similar?

The thing is, while the piston idea seems to be reliable, I am reluctant to introduce a very big change unless it is wholly necessary...

Coming back to the piston idea, the tilt could be solved easily by increasing the thickness of the piston, but what I'm worried about in this design is the constant wear and tear the piston might experience, especially if it is made of some soft, low-friction material.
 
Last edited:
"Oilite" bushings would seem to be the most cost-effective method here. Unless we are talking HIGH-speed and VERY tight tolerances required. But for the system it looks like you have, I would suggest drilling bearing bores thru the top & bottom capture plates while they are clamped together to ensure maximum alignment, then simple oil-impregnated bearings (SAE 841) press fit in the plates will work.

I've created similar systems, but with jack screws for transition.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K