Undergrad Any stable amorphous substances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amorphous Stable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of amorphous substances, particularly their melting points and viscosity characteristics compared to crystalline counterparts. It is established that the melting point of amorphous solids is generally lower than that of their crystalline forms, and they are often metastable against crystallization. The conversation also highlights specific examples, such as the viscosity of water and glycerin, and the unique behavior of polymers like SU-8, which exhibit true amorphous characteristics due to high entropic contributions to Gibbs energy. Additionally, the criteria for liquid to amorphous transitions are explored, emphasizing the role of molecular structure and entropic factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, particularly Gibbs free energy
  • Familiarity with viscosity measurements and their significance in materials science
  • Knowledge of polymer chemistry, specifically regarding amorphous and crystalline phases
  • Concept of glass transition temperature and its implications for material properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of SU-8 polymer and its applications in photolithography
  • Explore the concept of glass transition in detail, including its measurement techniques
  • Investigate the behavior of polymorphic substances and their transition mechanisms
  • Study the effects of entropic contributions on the stability of amorphous solids
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for materials scientists, polymer chemists, and physicists interested in the properties of amorphous materials and their applications in various fields, including manufacturing and materials engineering.

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
I´ve seen it asserted at the general physics forum that melting point of amorphous substance is "always" lower than the "melting point" of corresponding crystal.
Also, amorphous solids are often described as metastable against crystallization.

Does it necessarily apply to all amorphous solids?

For the viscosity of liquids is found in a broad range.
Among simple common substances - water conveniently has viscosity of 1 cP at 20 C (less than 1.01). The viscosity rises on cooling - to less than 1,8 cP at 0 C. Water easily freezes. At boiling point of 100 Celsius, viscosity of water is 0,28 cP.
Glycerine has freezing point of 18 Celsius, and freezing point viscosity of around 1700 cP. And glycerin readily supercools. On heating, viscosity of glycerin drops a lot. While heating glycerin is nasty (tends to decay to acrolein), the boiling point can be measured at 290 Celsius. Could not find viscosity measured or estimated at that region, but already at 170 Celsius, it is under 3 cP.
Molten silica comes to true melting equilibrium with crystal - cristobalite - around 1710 Celsius. And at that region, the viscosity of the melt is about 3*109 cP. On heating, it falls. But hot molten silica is too hot to handle - it tends to attack solid vessel materials. Its boiling point is hard to measure, but estimated at 2700...2800 Celsius (cannot be measured better). Its viscosity under those conditions? Still around 50 000 cP.

As you see, freezing point viscosity is found in a wide range. But beyond the range of these three? Any liquids with yet bigger freezing point viscosity?

On cooling liquids, while viscosity changes continuously, in the range of 1015 cP some other features like thermal expansion and heat capacity undergo a rapid change in a narrow range (how narrow, in terms of viscosity?). It´s called glass transition.

Are there any substances for which true thermodynamic equilibrium between ordered crystal and disordered phase does exist, but at conditions where the viscosity of the disordered phase is on the amorphous solid side of the glass transition? And therefore, a true thermodynamic equilibrium amorphous solid exists?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Many common plastics (PE, PP, PET) have crystalline fraction as solid, and that fraction is quite resistant to crystallization conditions change. Therefore, you can talk about equilibrium between amorphous and crystalline phases of plastic, although it is driven by entanglement of molecules, not by free energy.

In general, highly asymmetric molecules like (uncured) SU-8 polymer are impossible to crystallize at all, due very high entropic contribution to Gibbs energy, even at room temperature. SU-8 therefore can be called "truly amorphous", although technically everything would crystallize at near-
absolute zero temperature and very long time.
 
trurle said:
Many common plastics (PE, PP, PET) have crystalline fraction as solid, and that fraction is quite resistant to crystallization conditions change. Therefore, you can talk about equilibrium between amorphous and crystalline phases of plastic, although it is driven by entanglement of molecules, not by free energy.
You could have a true equilibrium if you could shift the condition to spontaneous transition into amorphous solid.
trurle said:
In general, highly asymmetric molecules like (uncured) SU-8 polymer are impossible to crystallize at all, due very high entropic contribution to Gibbs energy, even at room temperature.
Water is impossible to crystallize at room temperature because of entropic contribution to Gibbs energy (but easy to crystallize below room temperature).
trurle said:
SU-8 therefore can be called "truly amorphous", although technically everything would crystallize at near-
absolute zero temperature and very long time.
Helium won´t, but it has low viscosity even when not superfluid. I think solid He (both 3 and 4) are readily nucleated... how stable is supercooled liquid He?

So what I´m looking for is spontaneous transition to a solid of higher entropy which specifically lacks long range order.
 
snorkack said:
Water is impossible to crystallize at room temperature because of entropic contribution to Gibbs energy (but easy to crystallize below room temperature).
I feel you are playing with definitions. I meant entropic contribution at melting point, not above it.

The criteria for the liquid to amorphous transition is to have entropic part of Gibbs energy high enough to have melting point (defined as point then TS~dH(melting) )well below glass transition point (although the glass transition point definition is somewhat arbitrary, been based on human experience timescales). For most materials, the melting point is above glass transition point, but it is not a law. Nothing prohibits the reverse.

Alternative way to define liquid to amorphous transition is "direct transition from state dominated by 2-dimensional defects (slip planes in liquid) to state dominated by 0-dimensional defects (vacancies), skipping entirely the state dominated by 1-dimensional defects (dislocations in crystal)".

Using this definition, you can correctly predict what any substance which do not easily form dislocations (typically due irregular molecular packing happening with large, flexible and asymmetric molecules) will directly transit from liquid to glass.

Polymorphic substances may have even more complicated picture, because molecular structure changes with temperature in non-trivial way. For example, sulphur has small molecules and low viscosity at melting point, but polymerizes and become viscous liquid if heated further.
Cyanogen is even more bizarre - it melts at -28C, vaporizes at -21C, and condense back to glass if heated to 300C.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
44K