Question about the term "frozen"

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fig Neutron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology of "frozen" as it applies to substances that transition from liquid to solid, specifically focusing on water and copper. Participants explore the implications of using the term "frozen" for materials that are solid at room temperature, examining both common usage and scientific definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether copper, being solid at room temperature, can be considered "frozen" in the same way water is at 0 degrees Celsius.
  • One participant suggests that while it could technically be accurate to call solid copper "frozen," it may lead to confusion due to common associations with the term.
  • Another participant notes that terms like "frozen" are typically reserved for substances like water and dry ice, implying that "solid copper" would be more appropriate in practice.
  • There is mention of scientific literature referring to the "freezing point of copper," which some argue supports the use of the term "frozen" for copper.
  • One participant reflects on dictionary definitions of "frozen" and "freeze," suggesting that the term is more closely associated with water than with copper.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of using the term "frozen" for solid copper. While some acknowledge the technical accuracy, others emphasize the potential for confusion and advocate for alternative terminology.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the ambiguity in the term "frozen" as it relates to different materials, noting that common usage may not align with scientific definitions. There is also mention of the potential difference between freezing and melting points for some substances, though it is unclear if this applies to copper.

Fig Neutron
Messages
60
Reaction score
95
This may be a dumb question (which is often the case for questions you come up with at 2 am), but I would like to ask anyway.

For substances that are liquid at room temperature there is a freezing point (point that it becomes a solid) lower than the average temperature of a room. For the purpose of this question I am just going to use water and copper for my examples.

When water reaches 0 degrees Celsius it transitions into a solid. At this point the water is considered frozen. The melting point for copper is about 1075 degrees Celsius. Now this next part is the part that sounds weird. Does that mean that at the typical room temperature, when copper is a solid, it would be considered frozen?

If water is considered “frozen” at the point that it becomes a solid, does that mean that copper is considered “frozen” at the point that it becomes a solid? Generally people think of something as being frozen when it feels cold to us, so I don’t know if the term “frozen” is one that should not be used for this type of description or if I am thinking about it wrong.

Thank you for reading and hopefully my question makes sense.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Fig Neutron said:
Does that mean that at the typical room temperature, when copper is a solid, it would be considered frozen?

Sure. You could say that the copper is 'frozen' if you'd like. You just might get some raised eyebrows since most people don't use it in this context. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Comeback City and Fig Neutron
I remember seeing the temperatures for a substance as melting point (between solid and liquid) and boiling point (between liquid and gas). There are substances where it is called "frozen" like dry ice is frozen carbon dioxide. And of course water. I guess you could say frozen copper, but I don't think it would convey the meaning. Solid copper would probably be a term that would be used in practice.
 
Fig Neutron said:
at the typical room temperature, when copper is a solid, it would be considered frozen?
Using the term "frozen" in this context would be very confusing for a reader. It brings to my mind a picture of a lump of copper that's covered in hoar frost - which implies it would be at or below 0°C. That's not what you mean, I guess.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Using the term "frozen" in this context would be very confusing for a reader. It brings to my mind a picture of a lump of copper that's covered in hoar frost - which implies it would be at or below 0°C. That's not what you mean, I guess.

That’s correct, this was just a thought that I found interesting. I would not be likely to use the term “frozen” in this context, but I was wondering if it could technically be considered accurate. Even though it’s not the way people typically think of using “frozen” to describe a substance.
 
If you Google "freezing point of copper," several scientific articles come up, so I think it is an appropriate term. If I remember right, some materials have a slightly different freezing point than melting point. I doubt if copper is one of them, but water is. If you can find a "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics," it should list both points for many materials.
 
Fig Neutron said:
This may be a dumb question (which is often the case for questions you come up with at 2 am), but I would like to ask anyway.

For substances that are liquid at room temperature there is a freezing point (point that it becomes a solid) lower than the average temperature of a room. For the purpose of this question I am just going to use water and copper for my examples.

When water reaches 0 degrees Celsius it transitions into a solid. At this point the water is considered frozen. The melting point for copper is about 1075 degrees Celsius. Now this next part is the part that sounds weird. Does that mean that at the typical room temperature, when copper is a solid, it would be considered frozen?

If water is considered “frozen” at the point that it becomes a solid, does that mean that copper is considered “frozen” at the point that it becomes a solid? Generally people think of something as being frozen when it feels cold to us, so I don’t know if the term “frozen” is one that should not be used for this type of description or if I am thinking about it wrong.

Thank you for reading and hopefully my question makes sense.

When I looked up frozen in my dictionary, it said "see freeze"
When I looked up freeze, it said "be converted to or covered with ice".
Ice is the name of solid water, not the name of solid copper, so frozen is a reference to Water becoming Solid.
( the next sentence in the definition was "become rigid as the result of cold". That might work for copper - as long as you thought 1075 degrees was cold.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
82K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K