Anybody disappointed that James Cameron didn't win Oscars

  • Thread starter waht
  • Start date
  • #1
1,482
3
You may not like the movie, but it doesn't take Einstein to figure out that so much work and effort went into making Avatar, so much coordination was required, and working with cutting edge technology.

I think Jame Cameron should have won the Oscars for putting it all together and pushing the envelope.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,896
2,404
Nope.
I'm pleased that sanity seems to have returned to the Oscars.

Special Effects simply cannot be a substitute for a well-written story.
 
  • #3
18,243
7,871
I thought Hurt Locker was pretty good, but I don't know about best picture. Maybe this year had a poor crop of movies.
 
  • #4
255
0
I am very glad he did not win any award. The story was very unoriginal and not very thought provoking and I did not want to see cameron's ego continue to be boosted
 
Last edited:
  • #5
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,896
2,404
I thought Hurt Locker was pretty good, but I don't know about best picture. Maybe this year had a poor crop of movies.
Well, that's the thing. "Best picture" is entirely relative, isn't it? The best picture of the year is nothing more or less than - well - the best picture of the year. :tongue:
 
  • #6
255
0
Nope.
I'm pleased that sanity seems to have returned to the Oscars.
A semblance of sanity anyway.
 
  • #7
1,482
3
There was significant work and dedication that went into making Avatar. As a director Cameron he went boldly where no one has done before. He advanced film making. He created something novel. That's creativity. For that he should be rewarded.

Oh well, I guess the majority wins. I'm signing out.
 
  • #8
255
0
There was significant work and dedication that went into making Avatar. As a director Cameron he went boldly where no one has done before. He advanced film making. He created something novel. That's creativity. For that he should be rewarded.

Oh well, I guess the majority wins. I'm signing out.
It means nothing if the same old story is being regurgitated. The special effects where really NOT that spectacular to me. While I was at the movie theater, even with the 3-d glasses , I did not feel immersed in the movie with the characters. It was a pretty film to look at , but thats about it.
 
  • #9
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,820
0
There was significant work and dedication that went into making Avatar. As a director Cameron he went boldly where no one has done before. He advanced film making. He created something novel. That's creativity. For that he should be rewarded.
I guess he'll have to cry himself to sleep on the $2.6 billion his film took in.
 
  • #10
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,213
176
There was significant work and dedication that went into making Avatar. As a director Cameron he went boldly where no one has done before. He advanced film making. He created something novel. That's creativity. For that he should be rewarded.

Oh well, I guess the majority wins. I'm signing out.
What did he do that was so revolutionary? We've been watching novelty 3-D films since the 1950s.
 
  • #11
320
1
Revolutionary special effects do not, necessarily, a great movie make. You need a whole raft of other elements to come together with it, such as a compelling story, characters with depth, acting, cinematography, and soundtrack blending together seamlessly that causes you to suspend disbelief and live along with the characters in the movie. You forget that you're sitting in a seat and get lost entirely in the experience as a whole. Special effects alone don't do that.
 
  • #12
Lisa!
Gold Member
612
96
What do you think of Tarantino? Didn't he deserve an oscar?
And how about best actress? Don't you think Streep played better than Bullock?
 
  • #13
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
15
Giving him an oscar is like saying the best car is the fastest or the most expensive. Anyone can dream big technology wise, that's not something worthy of a reward... unless he actually made the technology himself.

But yah, I'm sure he wont lose any sleep over his billions taken in for the movie.
 
  • #14
320
1
I didn't see all of those, Lisa!, so I can't comment. Streep delivered, as always, an incredible performance. I don't think I've seen her do anything poorly. (Okay, maybe Death Becomes Her but that was just a bad movie.) I didn't see Bullock's performance.

What I am thrilled about is Up! winning for best animated movie. I loved that movie from end to end. I saw it first in 2-D, laughed myself silly, and then drug a bunch of people from work with me a few days later to see it in 3-D. I was knocked over all over again.
 
  • #15
Borek
Mentor
28,501
2,914
Avatar is a nice movie, but - despite technology - flat and shallow.
 
  • #16
98
0
Oscar is supposed to award movies with great thoughts.I'm happy Avatar didn't won the best film.

By the way,how do you guys think of Invictus?I really like it.Why didn't it won something?
 
  • #17
Chi Meson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,789
10
Avatar won 3 Oscars: Cinematography, art direction, and special effects. Those are exactly the ones it deserved, of course: "fastest," "shiniest," and "most expensive."

And man, that was one shiny movie.
 
  • #18
Lisa!
Gold Member
612
96
Avatar won 3 Oscars: Cinematography, art direction, and special effects. Those are exactly the ones it deserved, of course: "fastest," "shiniest," and "most expensive."

And man, that was one shiny movie.
hmmm...yeah! Avatar won any oscar that a physicist would win for a movie!:biggrin:
I didn't see all of those, Lisa!, so I can't comment. Streep delivered, as always, an incredible performance. I don't think I've seen her do anything poorly. (Okay, maybe Death Becomes Her but that was just a bad movie.) I didn't see Bullock's performance.

What I am thrilled about is Up! winning for best animated movie. I loved that movie from end to end. I saw it first in 2-D, laughed myself silly, and then drug a bunch of people from work with me a few days later to see it in 3-D. I was knocked over all over again.
I agree with you!:smile:
 
  • #19
106
1
You may not like the movie, but it doesn't take Einstein to figure out that so much work and effort went into making Avatar, so much coordination was required, and working with cutting edge technology.

I think Jame Cameron should have won the Oscars for putting it all together and pushing the envelope.
Avatar was better than The Hurt Locker. None of those films had a great story IMO. Hurt Locker IMO doesn't deserve the best picture of the year. It wasn't very engaging and it was too long. They could have cut it short with 25-30 mins and make it better. I was half asleep towards the end when it got interesting again. Documentaries about British SAS missions for example kept me better entertained. At least Avatar despite it's story didn't bore the living daylights out of me.

There is a bias towards "serious movies" at academy awards.
 
  • #20
1,104
25
UP should have won best overall picture this year. An animated film will never win best picture though because there simply is no acting involved.
 
  • #21
BobG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
185
80
I thought "Precious" and "Hurt Locker" were both much better movies than "Avatar".

"Avatar" was very entertaining and it was an exceptional job making the special effects enhance the movie instead of making the movie. Except entertainment was all it provided - it didn't require much thought or effort for the viewer.

The story line of "Hurt Locker" was just a lot better. The movie was also very well made.

A real life EOD episode - Dude, You Blew Up My Car
 
  • #22
106
1
"Up in the air" is the 2009 movie with the best story. Way better than both Avatar and The Hurt Locker.
 
  • #23
cronxeh
Gold Member
961
10
Oscars, just like the Nobel price, seem to be a major let down lately. Frankly, I don't care much for the opinion of any of these. The academy awards where actors pat each other on the back for acting is hilarious at its best


Star Trek won Oscar for best makeup ?? AHAHAHAH
 
Last edited:
  • #24
For me, it was Hurt Locker V/S Up in the air and I'm glad that finally Hurt Locker won :)

BTW, Avatar minus 3D Effects = Just another Sci-fi movie ;)
 
  • #25
19
1
Even though hurt locker was so horribly inacurate, I am still glad it won.
 

Related Threads on Anybody disappointed that James Cameron didn't win Oscars

  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
881
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Top